@TalGarik Glad it's working Make sure to double-check your cookie settings under Privacy > Cookies. Blocking third-party cookies is fine (I do as well) but it will break sites, so you need to be able to fix things when it does. Usually this is done by creating exceptions for domains you will accept 3rd party cookies from. If you're using Google's services, you generally have no choice but to accept them from google.com for single sign-on to work. I don't know how Firefox containers work, but I assume they don't block 3rd party cookies as default, simply because it would simply stop too many sites from working.

@niceMorty Nice to hear. I tag the thread as resolved.

@hdmule right on, glad you got everything sorted out and configured the way you want it. Just FYI, the POST vs GET privacy issue isn't just about the local machine. With your search being in the URL, it is exposed on the wire as well and gets stored in server logs that can expose it to more people. While POST doesn't magically secure that info, it does obscure it, and it would take more effort and more of a targeted attack to reveal what you're searching. All things together, it's a modest but real decrease in privacy vulnerabilities.

There is a problem then. The "cookie alert" was added back then by some web sites in response of a new law that requested whoever placed cookies to inform the "user" about them, as opt-in feature. It works the same about the consent you must provide to collect and use personal information, they ask because it is the law, not for fun. You could offer the "user" the option to remove/hide the alert but I don't think it can be a default setting of the browser.

@iAN-CooG It's more vanity than function, if I'm honest. Adguard has a lovely looking UI and a pretty good custom block function. Although I'm far from pleased with Ghostary. It has a premium thing now, it keeps blocking strange things, it's less responsive than it used to be, and I've read some stories about its reliability etc. Also, I've just noticed AdGuard also blocks tracking so it really is redundant. I'll turn it off for now and check out Privacy Badger if things become intrusive. Thank you for your suggestions though.

That poses the question, though, how ”exiting an App“ on Android should be defined.

Session Only will be improved.

I do not know, maybe they showed wrong, maybe these programs were badly picked up because I did not see that it was possible to send malware through cookies.

Yes. This would be awesome. Posted the same about a week ago... https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/36502/separate-login-cookies-for-web-panels

I wouñd like this functionality as well, basically, the ability to "sandbox" a web panel, storing all its session info/cookies, etc separate from the general store.

It would indeed be a cool feature, and it will draw attention to Vivaldi. But to be fair, there are already some great ad and tracking blockers out there. But a standard feature would be nice. I would say, look at Ghostery for some inspiration.

@cliffes Yes. Keyboard doesn't work in Evernote extension in Vivaldi. You can not add keywords,, change title, nothing. This is the reason I can not use Vivaldi as my browser

Moved to the correct forum where it may get noticed. The number of upvotes is not the only criterion for deciding what gets implemented.

@Peter, another option is to use the open source extension Cookie Autodelete. It is more versatile than the built in chromium features which Vivaldi is based.

Vivaldi Browser has a vast number of options. At least three ways to switch tabs .....

@pesala I know that I can filter, but I'm not looking for a particular domain. I want the list to be more readable.

In 2.1 Snapshot separate checkboxes for Local Storage and Cookies exist already.