@RjGunner111 A identification (Browsername and version) a browser sends to web servers.

@Gwen-Dragon No surprise there, but Vivaldi needs better cookie management anyway. Even if this doesn’t affect Vivaldi, the system is already broken as is. Database storage, filesystem storage and service workers aren’t deleted when quitting Vivaldi, no matter what you set. It has to be handled manually by visiting chrome settings. It’s stupid.

At first this doesn't work but when I downloaded a single file, yes. Then I downloaded a whole folder at once and the download dialog for this appeared finally. It's working now. Thanks!

@GJS said in iframes in Local Page Broken in Vivaldi 3.3: Plead my case with the Chromium developers? Yes. Please report at https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list After you got the report link, please report the issue to Vivaldi and add lin to Chromium bug. Do not forget a reproducible test case.

@mhile said in Google Drive Refusing to Download: [*.]googleusercontent.com Thanks! Worked a treat!

@TalGarik Glad it's working Make sure to double-check your cookie settings under Privacy > Cookies. Blocking third-party cookies is fine (I do as well) but it will break sites, so you need to be able to fix things when it does. Usually this is done by creating exceptions for domains you will accept 3rd party cookies from. If you're using Google's services, you generally have no choice but to accept them from google.com for single sign-on to work. I don't know how Firefox containers work, but I assume they don't block 3rd party cookies as default, simply because it would simply stop too many sites from working.

@niceMorty Nice to hear. I tag the thread as resolved.

@hdmule right on, glad you got everything sorted out and configured the way you want it. Just FYI, the POST vs GET privacy issue isn't just about the local machine. With your search being in the URL, it is exposed on the wire as well and gets stored in server logs that can expose it to more people. While POST doesn't magically secure that info, it does obscure it, and it would take more effort and more of a targeted attack to reveal what you're searching. All things together, it's a modest but real decrease in privacy vulnerabilities.

I agree! "Vivaldi should definetely have an option to block these dialogs or accept them by default." Please, add that option.

@iAN-CooG It's more vanity than function, if I'm honest. Adguard has a lovely looking UI and a pretty good custom block function. Although I'm far from pleased with Ghostary. It has a premium thing now, it keeps blocking strange things, it's less responsive than it used to be, and I've read some stories about its reliability etc. Also, I've just noticed AdGuard also blocks tracking so it really is redundant. I'll turn it off for now and check out Privacy Badger if things become intrusive. Thank you for your suggestions though.

That poses the question, though, how ”exiting an App“ on Android should be defined.

Session Only will be improved.

I do not know, maybe they showed wrong, maybe these programs were badly picked up because I did not see that it was possible to send malware through cookies.

Yes. This would be awesome. Posted the same about a week ago... https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/36502/separate-login-cookies-for-web-panels

I wouñd like this functionality as well, basically, the ability to "sandbox" a web panel, storing all its session info/cookies, etc separate from the general store.

It would indeed be a cool feature, and it will draw attention to Vivaldi. But to be fair, there are already some great ad and tracking blockers out there. But a standard feature would be nice. I would say, look at Ghostery for some inspiration.

@cliffes Yes. Keyboard doesn't work in Evernote extension in Vivaldi. You can not add keywords,, change title, nothing. This is the reason I can not use Vivaldi as my browser

Moved to the correct forum where it may get noticed. The number of upvotes is not the only criterion for deciding what gets implemented.