This is seriously a life saviour and would be great to have since you don't have to browse aimlessly or save anything onto the computer. I use this feature to save things on my google photos but it's great to have regardless.

@LonM said in Extended Link Properties: While this would be nice, it is my experience that some web servers don't always report the size of a download before starting. That can confuse even the default download manager of a browser. I agree, some web servers don't always report the size of a download, but many give this information and it very conveniently.

@jumpsq Yes, would be nice to have it.

But the key combination Shift + ESC is also very useful.

@jesus2099 No thanks, but I appreciate the reply. I don't want to use other unknown apps or extra steps. As I said, it is possible for Vivaldi to add it without being banned from the Play store, as Brave and Firefox have done. Firefox blocks two APIs to do it. I want everything in one place that I trust, which is Vivaldi. Because Vivaldi exceeds every other browser in it's productivity and customization, merely adding the steps to block the APIs which allow background video playing would put it ahead of Firefox and Brave, obviating the need for users to choose those browsers over Vivaldi when using media in their browser. Users repeatedly requested to add that to Firefox, and now it is in there, and isn't banned from the Play store. If users requested it, and got it, those users are clearly going to stick with Firefox if they wanted that feature and can find it there. Here, I would rather improve Vivaldi to broaden the user base. Expand Vivaldi's capabilities, and more users will have more reasons to join and stick with it.

The lack of this feature prevents me from switching from Opera to Vivaldi on mobile devices... I'd love to dispose Opera completely, but I do need this feature (low vision)...

@an_dz Thanks for pointing out the right nodeBB component. Issue opened. If it's unclear, let me know and I'll edit.

@dancer18 Vivaldi could be that 1 browser. There is no other better browser GUI/All-In-One Feature Rich browser. Add mozillas containers technology and you have one powerful browser that can accommodate any web-surfer across all major operating systems. My dream browser would be Vivaldi Quantum for all the about:config settings that would be introduced including those mozilla/tor-project collaborations but this is but a dream. I'm grateful for Vivaldi and do use it. In a time where other take features away, Vivaldi give you all the furniture and allows you to set it all to fit your needs. I have come to like this so much that there have been times I'd wished that Vivaldi, like Affinity Designer or Photoshop, were to allow me to save different layouts for different working scenarios. I think this would actually be a good feature. I see all Vivaldi has done with the browser and it is good. The browser has come very far both on desktop and mobile. It is the one chromium flavor I use and recommend.

I think having this functionnality as an option for each extension is a great idea. It's been 3 years and still this feature would be greatly appreciated I think.

@JohnConnorBear Could you please take your infinite wisdom elsewhere, to some other part of teh interwebs not yet blessed by your glorious presence. You have made it perfectly clear how much you detest this forum and its members, so it boggles the mind to see you still here, participating with such vigor. Seems like energy wasted, if you ask me. Although I know you wouldn't. (My apologies to the mods and fellow members for this outburst, but sometimes enough is just enough. I'm willing to follow my own advice, if needed.)

@sena23 Use the extension by @LonM Links Panel: https://github.com/LonMcGregor/LinksPanel https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/links-panel/nnnheolekoehkioeicninoneagaimnjd

I vote for this. Also, man, how Opera 12 in 2012 was advanced software.

Yes! with a toggle that rememberes its last state. Would be amazing

@Gwen-Dragon I'm thinking about some not-too-complicated process, like // the bug needs to be properly indexed in the database first function CheckBugsDatabase("SomethingDoesn'tWork") { var TheBug = get BugReport("SomethingDoesn'tWork"); var duplicates = CheckForDuplicatedReports(TheBug); // checking if it was already reported if (duplicates>"x") { // if it was reported at least "x" times var bugData = getBugBasicData(TheBug); // get the basic info about the bug exportToTheList(bugData); // send it to the "known issues" list } else if (duplicates==0) { // if it wasn't already reported saveToBugReportsDatabase(TheBug); // just save it to the database } } // this is just a primitive example of how it could be done, it's not an actual code This is pretty much how I imagine those companies doing their "known issues" lists. I mean, it's obviously doable. "Where there's a will, there's a way"... 😉 @Gwen-Dragon said in A place for a "Known Issues List" of the current stable release of Vivaldi: (...) It is not a easy-to-do-i-5-minutes job to filter information which should not go into public. (...) I think that the "reported x times" condition is good enough for that matter. If an issue has been reported at least several times, there's a pretty good chance that it's already been made public somewhere on the forums or on the team blog. But they can always decide not to publish a certain bug report - despite it's being reported frequently - for any reason. And they should obviously publish only the most important (from a user's perspective) information about the bug (like what it causes and whether it's fixed already or not just yet), not the whole report and technical data (especially if it's a security flaw or something like that). @Gwen-Dragon said in A place for a "Known Issues List" of the current stable release of Vivaldi: (...) that all this public list would bind too much human power which would be better invested in more features and bug fixing. ... and managing duplicated bug reports. 😉 PS. By talking about "thousands" of bugs, you look to me like an optimist. 😁

The only extension to add DANE/TLS support has ended development https://www.dnssec-validator.cz/ I have been asking for this code to be integrated into the browser for several years, as it; a) would avoid the problems the extension developers faced b) make Vivaldi a world leader in secure authenticated browsing However as votes are what get features added, not importance, don't expect to see this ability until the choice is taken away and it is forced on all browsers.