@sedative29rus
Спасибо, проверю, отправлю, ибо это критично.

@JoelYoung Maybe by creating a custom css file. See this old post for some details:

Possible small font solution

@eskaigarcia Not really.

I actually don't even get the whole "up to date" versus "out of date" thing, especially when speaking of an interface one can make look any way they want.

My only criteria are whether too much space is consumed by the UI, and whether I can have each function I want just a click away.

For me, the answer to the first criterion is "no," and to the second, "yes." Everything I don't want or need in the UI, I remove. Everything I do want, I place where it will be comfortable for me to access. Then I pick a color scheme and degree of rounding and transparency of elements that strikes my fancy, and go to work. It suits me right down to the ground.

If you want to see "dated," by all means look at Otter Browser. The UI looks like opera did 25 years ago, only more bleak, drab and featureless. I guess it's fast, but it does pretty much nothing I want, so who cares if it does it at lightning speed? I need my functions (email, moveable bars and tabs, customizable appearance, etc.) and I'm flexible as to how they are presented. All else are non-issues to me.

@sgunhouse
🤔
Site issue?

@Quaant
Then you will need to report it to the site itself.

@Cranker said in V 6.7 | How to rollback the context menu font ?:

@nomadic @yngve

Thanks a lot. It works.
I am glad that Vivaldi team has found a workaround to the issue.
I don't know what chromium devs were thinking when they created and approved this change. Will just hope that either they will be forced to revert changes by community, or at least that the workaround will keep working. Using this new style menu is a real pain.

Personally, my opinion is that the developers of programs do not use their own programs.

@czvacko As I said above, online OCSP/CRL validation, based on querying servers and URLs embedded in the certificates, has been performed since before 1.0, if fact since before the very first Technology Preview of Vivaldi. It is not remotely new.

Public CAs are required to have those URLs embedded in their certificates. Company internal CAs aren't but they may conceivably be using software that does so automatically.

There has also been a number of changes in Chromium the past couple of years regarding certificate processing (including that the main rootstore is now part of our configuration and source code, and the Chromium source is doing all certificate processing and verification inside Chromium/Vivaldi, not using OS APIs), and that may also have had an impact.

My suggestion would be to use a tool like Wireshark to see what exactly happens at the network level, unless inspecting the site certificate and its chain (Especially the AIA, OCSP, and CRL fields) turns up a likely source of the problem.

Baah, Floorp has so many nice things already integrated (I missed those menu icons 🤗 and little switches) and which are such a pain to manually add to/enable in FFN, so I'm back to it 😁 (despite it using XWayland 😤 by being a Firefox ESR)

@shaedrashiro

Make the translation in another Tab with another Translator and write your text in the right place.

@npro Oh Wow. Thanks. Thanks to @hsyn04 as well.

You know what it was? I was typing "notes" into search. Looking at your responses I said "no" to myself. Yep hitting backspace once and having just "note" gives me exactly what is needed (as you added).

Thanks so much for the help.

Call it what you like. It was a bug.
The horizontal tab bar is different because the tabs shrink when more tabs are added.

@Pesala said in Return new tab button to the old place.:

More thought is needed.

@qq2 Please note Vivaldi has a small development staff.

See https://www.howtogeek.com/656466/what-is-aboutblank-and-how-do-you-remove-it/

I don't think it's a bug, since about:blank is buiit into the web browser (from Chromium).

@barbudo2005 yw! 🙂

🇺🇦 Топ 100 Київ

@asgeirtj You don’t understand the concept. I don’t blame you though. Yes, it is currently absolutely possible without any kind of custom mod to display the status bar and the status info overlay at the same time. For this to work have the status bar visible, but have no status info element present in any toolbar, then the status info overlay will pop up when hovering a link. You have to discern between status bar, status info element, and status info overlay. These are three distinct elements which decide how your setup will relate to the present UI.

@Viqsi I'm pretty sure Vivaldi's webapp UI is unique in the browsing universe. It is an additional layer and thereby an expanded area where not only Vivaldi code changes, but also Chromium changes can trigger errors seen nowhere else. Further, every single machine that runs Vivaldi creates a unique environment, non-replicable by devs or testers, where some incompatibility or error may arise.

One way Vivaldi tries to defend against unanticipated friction in the interface, is to have (around seventy at present, I think) volunteer internal testers (called Sopranos), using Vivaldi on every age, capability and configuration of hardware possible, as many hours a day a possible, report back on every cock-up detected. So if any of my machines trips over anything, I report to devs ASAP. Same with the other Sopranos.

I not only use the bleeding edge of Vivaldi as my daily driver some 17 hours a day on my main Windows machine, I also test on three more towers (both Windows and Linux on one of these) and an old X86 laptop here in my office, two newer laptops that don't get turned on every day, a phone, a tablet, and two more towers (one somewhat obsolete) at my remote office when I'm there. To make matters worse, I read all the English posts in the Forum daily and try to reproduce bugs reported by users.

I'm not sure other Sopranos test on as many different kinds of hardware - in fact I'm sure they don't. No one hordes computers like me.

But when the devs and testers cannot reproduce an issue, there is no way to address it. Luckily if, say, even ten percent of users have a specific issue caused by a specific bit of code, one or more of the testers or devs is going to be able to reproduce it, and it's going to get tracked down. It's for this reason that thirty to fifty issues are resolved by the team every. single. day. And I don't even recognize most of the issues in the daily changelog, so I know even obscure glitches are being detected and remedied all the time. Yay team.

No toś mi pojechał (albo pojechała) 😉
My pictures are memes.
In the first one, in the background of the frame from the movie Marie-Antoinette is the text "if they can't afford gasoline let them drive teslas".
Yours - I don't know. It looks like a simplified table of variation (conjugation) of the verbs "jechać" and "jeździć". There is no suppositional mode, e.g. "jeździłbym". Strange genus names - not "neutralny" but "nijaki". And in the plural there should be only two "męskoosobowy" and "niemęskoosobowy".
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
odmiana czasownika

Google翻訳者は「運転中」と「運転中」を区別しないのですか？

@enc0re on 6.6 it was possible to get this error but much more unlikely.
The command line mitigation is a suitable workaround since the Chromium devs still dare to consider Wayland support an experimental feature in 2024.

Bluey!

JPG, 640 x 364, 231 465 Bytes
maj
The image is a link to a page with a JPG file!