@BH9 said in Drag and Drop in Download Panel:
This gives us 2 mins 40 secs per day
Your employees spend more time per day spacing out staring at the downloads list. Do you really think you're optimizing your employees work habits on the order of 160 seconds per day, 3 seconds at a time? They kill more of the company's time playing games on their phones in the bathroom, or smoking a cigarette. If a product was truly the best option for the staff due to other efficiencies, and there was one issue which cost less than 11 hours per year, that's a very minor cost.
Thank you for the math demonstrating just how trivial an issue this is. I use Vivaldi because it's best for me. It's not best for everybody, no browser is. For me, the myriad workflows that Vivaldi enables that Chrome does not saves me far more than 11 hours per year. If Vivaldi doesn't provide the same benefits to your employees, I would question the idea of putting them on the browser in the first place. Really, I'd let them use whatever browser they were most comfortable with, and the whole concept of compounding the time becomes irrelevant.
If you're standardizing your workforce to all use the same browser, then what are the reasons for choosing Vivaldi in the first place? Presumably because it enables far more efficient workflows, and I would hope the gains are far in excess of 11 hours per year if you're making people use a niche browser that the vast majority of them have probably never even heard of.
If it's just some tasks that you use Chrome for, but generally prefer Vivaldi, I think you're in the majority. Most of us probably have several browsers on our systems & we reach for the tool that suits the job at the time. I've got half a dozen browsers on my workstation. Vivaldi is my daily driver because, as I mentioned above, it's more efficient for the ways I like to work -- much more efficient. The ways are too numerous to list. But there are some things I pull up either Chrome, Firefox or Edge to do.
I spend more than 11 hours per year taking naps in the office.
Decades ago when I tracked time for billing purposes the smallest increment was 6 minutes. 160 seconds isn't even half of that. We literally couldn't even track a loss of time that small, and that's after you've compounded many many multiples of less time than a sip of water takes. No business is tracking human efficiencies that tiny.
