@Pathduck Yes, I understand you.
I also know this situation is very awkward. Because people see the red test results and they get worried. I understand them.
But I also want the truth to come out.
The fact is that Microsoft Defender also blocks software developed by aardio. It's not just Avast.
So, it doesn't matter if you use Versioner or not. I understand and respect people's decisions.
In fact, even software developed in C# can be intercepted and treated as a virus by different antivirus programs. There are very many cases where antivirus software treats normal C / C# developed software as a threat. Even if the software is developed by the user himself.
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/windows-defender-reports-a-trojan-1/1046937
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/be95d43b-4420-4a19-b92f-28e917374cec/windows-defender-reports-a-trojan-for-c-project?forum=visualstudiogeneral
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62989132/windows-defender-suddenly-started-to-delete-my-exe-while-other-anti-virus-progra
This is something that most desktop software developers cannot avoid.
There is a solution, of course, for developers to submit their software to all antivirus platforms for registration one by one.
But this is a boring and pointless task for developers.
So I'd rather people see the 😱 horrible antivirus test results and quit using the software I've developed than waste my energy and time on the boring task of submitting software registrations to antivirus platforms one by one.
If I were developing commercial software that generated revenue, I would do that. But if it's software developed for interest and sharing, I don't want to quench my passion. Forgive me.
Why am I reluctant to give up aardio?
I think aardio is the best choice for developing small to medium sized software.
aardio is developed and maintained by one person, completely created by him, with 17 years to pound out the independent programming language and a dedicated IDE, and aardio's developer strength is very impressive.
This is different from today's desktop software development frameworks that are basically developed by companies, teams of many people.
Even Lazarus was developed by three people. Of course the volume and scope of development cannot be compared. But the spirit of one person to independently develop and maintain a complete, efficient and elegant desktop software development framework deserves my respect. That's one of the reasons why I'm sticking with aardio.
One person can spend so many years developing a stand-alone language and IDE, and the size is only 19.2MB, no other desktop software development framework can do it at present.
Plus aardio's syntax is so elegant that the development efficiency is the highest of all desktop software development frameworks on Windows. These are the reasons why I chose aardio.
Using aardio is as comfortable as using the Ruby programming language.
So I can tolerate the fact that it is not recognized by antivirus platforms. In fact, no desktop software development framework escapes being misunderstood by antivirus platforms
It's not easy enough for one person to maintain a language and IDE.
