@pesala Thank you for fixing it and having a look at it. I guess I should clarify that I'm not expecting this to be something they could change over night, I'm more thinking over the course of 6 months it could slowly mold into something more organized as time goes on and more features gets added. And for existing users it should definitely stay as it is, because you're absolutely right about that, it would be really confusing for them to have the menu all of the sudden change drastically on them without their input. However, I would recommend it being an option at first, so people could try it out and see how they feel, and then as I mentioned, over time it would get to a point where the developer would iterate on it until they get a final version that's ready to replace the old default. Also, the way I presented it was my own ideal setup, but most important part is actually the design and user experience goal it's trying to achieve, not the specific setup. So The idea is that it would make it easier to customize one kind of thing at a time, so you start with preference based settings, then you move on to view based settings so that they can hide stuff they don't think they will use and so on. And yes, you could just search for "Show" but then about half of the results are actually unrelated to what I'm personally looking for since it also shows you related options to the show options. So all of these settings also shows up that I'm not interested in and only adds a lot of clutter: "Use Buttons in Range Controls" "Show Background Image" (with 9 image options for me) "Detect Page Tittle Notifications" "Remove Tab Spacing" "Dim Icon When Hibernated" "Cycle in Recently Used Order" "Cycle in Tab Order" "Switch Tabs By Scrolling" "Minimize Active Tab" "Fast Forward and Rewind" "Show Full Address" "Select Address on Activation" "Copy and Cut Encoded Address" "Page Load Progress Bar" "Include Bookmarks" "Include Typed History" "Always Search In New Tab" "Search In Address Field" "In Address Field" "In Search Field" "Hide the mouse cursor for page- initiated fullscreen" A simple way to improve it, would to have to option to grey out or even hide related matches. Though it would still not be ideal since if you searched for anything other than "Show", you would likely get a lot less relevant results. So a solution that would allow them to keep the menu with the same structure and settings, and just add a dropdown below the search bar that allows you to filter out different kind of settings. The option names in the dropdown could be the same as the category names I suggested, with an all option being the default. So if you pick the View filter in the dropdown, it could show you only settings that will toggle visibility for UI elements. Again, that's just an example, I'm not saying it has to work that way. As for the help documentation and it being a lot of work. I hope you as a moderator knows that Vivaldi is relatively new compared to the other browsers out there. Nothing is set in stone and it will without a doubt evolve and change over time, so the help documentation will have to have to get updated and they will have to do a lot of hard work. Besides, the Vivaldi developers have clearly showed that they can tackle a lot of hard problems, that other browser developer doesn't even bother trying to do. So I can't imagine changing up the settings menu to be too difficult for it to be worth doing. I hope I don't come off as too nit picky or have too high expectations, I would just like what's best for the browser so that it gets adopted by enough people to keep the project profitable for the developers. And it also raises the bar for the feature set that people are going to start to expect from other browsers, which means better options for everyone.

@pafflick Yup. Thread about dead birds reminded me about this but I didn't see that on list so I added it.

I think it's misleading because it might make people think that ticking that box is enough to make the search private. Which is obviously not the case. So I also agree that the proposed change is a lot less ambiguous.

@neltherion When Vivaldi 2.0 Stable is released, this thread will be tagged as DONE and moved to the archive. Meanwhile, users could still suggest refinements to the feature, for example, to make the slider position move freely instead of only in fixed increments of 30 pixels.

Changes to how background images are applied are in the works! It may not turn out exactly like what you are asking for OP, but I agree that only showing the image behind the tab bar looks a little odd when it is on either side.

@ayespy night :)

@lonm I think he means something like this I used this feature also a long time, but since there's the ability to scroll up with mouse gestures it's even more easier (see Pesalas post @bebotette )

Not sure about GTK, but in KDE I can do that - mind you, I have to remove the whole frame to do so.

@margarita Maybe the request title should be "[Zoom] Option to show minus/plus buttons along the slider" But having the "numeric" zoom size is useful as I often use "awkard" values like 83% 87% 72% 53% for different pages and the slider is "approximative" in doing that.

@pesala Anyway I will lose the way how it is related to history in "source tab". List in "Recently closed tabs" button is also linear. Yes, I know that it's like having and eating my cake at the same time ;) The root problem is that browsers treat history as "linear process" while it's not.

@pesala I tried. Didn't see any similarities. Thanks anyway.

@rmagnuson It's up to the user to choose colours that contrast more. Bevelling and drop shadows would be worth having.

You could do this with a mod. Something like .minimal-ui #header{ display: none; } Though then, like @Pesala mentioned you would have no way to drag a window. You could play with setting an appropriate height and min-height values to get a very small transparent bar which would still afford you space to drag.

@pesala said in Ability to position a bookmarks bar folder to the far-right: The OP is not asking for right alignment That's exactly what he's asking for because that's what he said :-) . I think you are misunderstanding something. He's not talking about overflow extender on a full bar, and he never said that. He's asking for left/right alignment of specific folders (some folders on the left, some on the right), and that's what he's showing on the screenshot for a partially filled bar, not a full bar. And no, you cannot move folders to empty space on a partially filled bar.