AI Assistant to Vivaldi
-
@Catweazle Yes, the Learning Model is not as intelligent as a human. I was only testing it because users ask for AI in our forum.
-
@DoctorG, I think Andi until now is the best choice, because of not only accuracy, but also of privacy and philosophy very similar to the one of Vivaldi (see privacy)
-
@Catweazle, I understand that Vivaldi doesn’t want to include an AI by default, and users can add their own. My suggestion is more about having a native Vivaldi feature that allows us to integrate custom models using our API keys. This native integration could enhance the functionality by enabling the AI to analyze and interact directly with the open page content, providing features like summarization, email drafting, and more, all seamlessly within Vivaldi. Essentially, it would be an added flexibility without bundling a fixed AI solution, just the framework to support our chosen models. Does that clarify?atweazle
-
@DoctorG blaming developers for bad response is really stupid always, that's why prompt engineering comes into play. One need to keep in mind, genai is never perfect nor accurate but if instructed properly with user intent and context it is more than close.
-
@raalapas said in AI Assistant to Vivaldi:
I'm reaching out to suggest integrating an AI assistant
Simply no unless it can completely disabled by those that do not want it.
-
@raalapas I blame those who are responsible for sale and promotion of such AI as a solution for finding information. Programmers partly and other deciders are fully responsible for their product.
Do not blame users for writing wrong questions. These users do not know they need a Bachelor in Information technology to create correct questions and use it in such AI.
-
@DoctorG, generative AI can be usefull in certain profesional use, but specific ones in medicine, physic, astronomy...., but the ones for particular use only with a grain of slt. I use Andi, because this type of a mere assistant for search result usefull or me, because on specific searches it shows direct answers istead of 50.00 results which has nothing to do with what I was searching, because an AI search for concepts and not for keywords as a normal search engine.
Andi don't invent nothing all it's answers are based on real time webcontent from reliable sources, not of a base in the own LLM like a ChatBot does. That is the difference.
But this, the answer is only that precise as the question you make, for a normal keyword search is better to use a normal search engine, like Startpage or Mojeek, which I also use.
Using an API incorporated in the browser is always limited, because a good reliable AI need a huge serverpower which is not given in a selfhosted or local manner.
Using other online services like ChatGPT or similar are privacy nightmares, in which Andi also is the exception.
-
my other thought is since Quick commands can manipulate the browser in most ways it could be an option to use as a panel and basically do what most Browser AI can do but it would throw the queries to the search the user chose basically the same as quick commands but different UI and saves the queries
-
@Catweazle Google's AI is An LLM and it can Answer how to Setup A Windows 10 PC Like Batman lol
only Gemini
-
When ever I need assistance from AI, I go to https://duck.ai/ and ask it to perform the task.
It works both on laptop and on mobile.
I don't need nor want AI in my browser directly.
-
@supermurs, it's also not necessary, because there are zillions of online AI services of any kind out there, which can be used at any moment if the user want and specific for his needs.
https://www.futuretools.io
https://www.futurepedia.io
https://huggingface.co/spaces -
The answer is to ban AI for the foreseeable future and roll search engines to what they were pre 2010 when they actually found what you were looking for and didn't make the entire first page of results ads and everything else you weren't looking for.
-
@Catweazle Check out Venice.ai. It's from a hard-core privacy source.