Self-Hosted Sync
-
In light of recent sync issues due to load and growth, it would seem to me to be a good idea to have the ability to have self-hosted sync. It is something that has been done with browsers like Firefox. It could be a docker type system that a technical user could deploy for their own sync services.
I know it is a small chance of this happening, but just a thought.
-
@Cretec It is planned that source of Sync server will be available, but no time line.
-
Was just about to ask this.
1+ vote for this. Would like to be able to host own sync service, would be cool. With the ability to fallback on Vivaldi Server if own self-host becomes unavailable.
-
-
@DoctorG Thanks, that is good to know.
-
@Catweazle That is fine for one time / emergency needs, and we use a similar tool for that purpose. It is what we have had to do during this outage.
Just not as convenient or efficient as using a regular sync. I think this would help the overall sync, by allowing this for the more technical folk or groups.
-
Re: Self-Hosted Sync
I've been able to satisfactorily perform and maintain a self-hosted sync for my browsers using Syncthing. Running a separately hosted Syncthing process on my own Linux server running docker, which was already being used to sync multitudes of other service data, I achieved a fresh install on a Windows VM instance. It might not have been as simple had my server not been currently running Syncthing that could be leveraged for this situation.
-
We need this feature. Will be great to get company's to vivaldi instead of other browsers.
-
A self-hosted sync service for Vivaldi is a good idea in principle, but there’s an easier way. Why not enable synchronization via cloud storage or a network drive? This approach would make the feature accessible to a larger number of users. The use of solutions like Nextcloud and others I won’t name here is already widespread. The Vivaldi account can still remain mandatory if necessary. I don’t mind.
-
@fcastle
Hi, how does your solution decide which device is which?
I sync many devices with 3 different Vivaldi accounts, one for stable and one for the snapshot (Beta) for example.
@rsswanson
Hi, same question, a cloud store data but you need an active server system like a web server.
This would be possible with an Amazon AWS but they want money.It is not as easy as many users think, a simple backup system would be easier.
Or add more to the export feature, Sessions, mail accounts and so forth.Cheers, mib
-
@mib2berlin said in Self-Hosted Sync:
a simple backup system would be easier
That IS what i want:
https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/103856/add-import-export-as-another-option-for-sync -
Self hosted sync has been requested before, the main request is here -> https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/64900/our-own-server-to-authenticate-users-and-sync-their-preferenced
-
Hi!
Since this topic has been discussed on the pointed link:
https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/64900/our-own-server-to-authenticate-users-and-sync-their-preferencedPlease,
Continue there.--
PS! Often you'll get an answer to your question faster by using the Search Function.
Plus LonM'sThank you
-
ZZalex108 locked this topic on
-
ZZalex108 moved this topic from Desktop Feature Requests on