Feature requests for 1.6
-
Opera 12.x (and lower) type interface customisation. (allows all user interface to be customised)
-
@hot_denim The separators appear in the Bookmarks Bar
-
I wasn't able to find this in a Google search, so I apologize if it's a repeat:
I would love to be able to open files that are on plain text (*.txt, *.log, *.ini, etc) in Vivaldi for quick viewing rather than needing to save them. I view a lot of logs for work, and in Opera 12 (and older) I could simply open the log in a tab in the browser (they were usually *.txt files) and view it there, which made things faster and much easier for me.
-
If save Tab Stack which is renamed for example Test name 1, and save it to bookmarks, it creates only a folder called Stack. Then again I must rename this folder in the bookmark manager. Please add a feature to automatically save rename the title tab stack. Thanks
-
Video Pop-Out
A similar feature has been launched by Opera recently wherein any video being played can be popped out in a small floating window on the browser, so that the user can browse the web while continuing to watch the video.
It is surprisingly a very useful feature, and one which no user will be able to live without upon trial as experienced by me first-hand.
Please help with this. -
@chronicler92 You seem to be still alive.
You can add a video channel as a Web Panel. Then it can be played without obscuring the page that you're currently reading.
-
@chronicler92 said in Feature requests for 1.6:
It is surprisingly a very useful feature, and one which no user will be able to live without upon trial as experienced by me first-hand.
Disagree. I tried it once and I've never used it again.
-
@mrbenjoi it was my reply also to the OP @gaelle . One can wish different things, but with what is given now and what you suggesting the best bet would be creating several posts (main features) within one topic (e.g. Vivaldi 1.7). Then the users can reply to that main feature post they need to.
- OP / Main feature post / wishes, wishes, wishes....
- OP / Main feature post 2 / wishes, wishes, wishes....
So, in @mrbenjoi's example
- ...
- ...
- Feature Requests (All Platforms) // Vivaldi 1.7 or 1.x.x.x.x
- Appearance // main feature post 1
- Themes
- User Interface
- Tabbed Browsing // main feature post 2
- Tabs // users' wishes for Tabbed Browsing
- Tab-Groups // users' wishes for Tabbed Browsing
- Tiling // wishes
- Panel // main feature post 3
- Bookmarks // main feature post 4
- Session-Management // main feature post X
- Saved Sessions // wishes for Session-Management
- Startup //...
- History // main feature post ...
- Speed Dial // main feature post ...
- Quick-Commands // main feature post ...
- Appearance // main feature post 1
Obviously, for organizational reasons and to not to be confusing, there can be only two levels for the tree-structure.
-
@ROTFL Did you know that the path and filename are shown in the Status Bar?
-
@Pesala Wow... nope xD
But it's useful only when user enable status bar -
@Pesala I do not understand your answer? (my message was in relation to the whole interface)
-
Add an option to disable "Typed history" in the address bar for privacy.
Typed history will show when you press this button in the address bar:
-
Add "Command + Enter" to this.
(For Mac)
-
1.6 Stable is now out. We should move on to the 1.7 Feature Requests thread.
-
@D0J0P said in Feature requests for 1.6:
We should move on to the 1.7 Feature Requests thread.
Gaelle has not created it yet, AFAIK, so posting in some other thread of that name won't achieve much. Perhaps we need to wait for the first 1.7 Snapshot to be released?
-
@Pesala I thought this was the 1.7 Feature Request thread: https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/12915/feature-requests-for-1-7
But then I realized that it's in the Windows category. If it could be moved to All Platforms, then we could just continue there.
-
@D0J0P said in Feature requests for 1.6:
1.6 Stable is now out. We should move on to the 1.7 Feature Requests thread.
Ah what's the point? These threads are huge and totally unmanageable, I doubt any sane developer ever goes through them.
We already know what the feature requests for 1.7 are: All the features here that were not implemented yet. -
@duarte.framos said in Feature requests for 1.6:
I doubt any sane developer ever goes through them.
Since gaelle, who started it, is the community manager, I am sure she will write a report for the developers if they don't have time to sort the thread by "upvotes" and read the first two or three pages.
-
@Pesala said in Feature requests for 1.6:
Since gaelle, who started it, is the community manager, I am sure she will write a report for the developers if they don't have time to sort the thread by "upvotes" and read the first two or three pages.
Ah yes good point, that would certainly help, but only solves part of the problem. The larger underlying problem remains though: Voting is totally skewed.
The first posts will inevitably gather a whole lot more votes than the ones towards the end, not because more people want them or because they are higher on the priorities list, but simply because they are the most visible. -
As each thread would be for a point update - 1.7; 1.8; 1.9 etc
Why not limit each thread to a few pages and then "lock" for new posts whilst still allowing upvotes? That way each update would possibly have a manageable number of requests.We could also have another thread to collect "beyond next update" request/discussions.