Details matter. Vivaldi 1.6 is ready
-
Mail/sync has been delayed since a while ago, so it's been known it won't come out this year. I'm hoping that Q1 of next year would be the release, but that's my guess.
-
There's at least one thread about this in the forums. That would be a better place to discuss the topic.
-
To be clear, nothing has been delayed. Work is ongoing on mail and sync and progress is being made. They are simply big jobs.
-
3 versions later, I'm still seeing the problem where links I open from Gmail result in blank pages. I first noticed it in the snapshot builds after the 1.3 release and it only happens on my laptop, so for now, I have to stick to Vivaldi 1.3 there. Wish I knew what was wrong and if there's a workaround though.
-
I meant 2014, of course.
-
I think I meant that it was expected around last year or very early 2016 that it was going to come in Q4 2016, but that there was a lot more work than expected.
How's sync/mail looking right now? What's your best guess as to the release in a snapshot?
-
I decline to guess, except that it's my impression we will probably see mail before sync.
-
Okay no I'm sure, definitely I don't recommend Vivaldi around me…
the stupid update block my ALL Vivaldi Browser...
It's a final update ! not Snapshot ! and If you post quickly the update WITHOUT test I'm sure is just horrible...
And I have proof, your DON'T test because If you try "vivaldi://mail"
You find a strange part of Mail program... thank you Vivaldi... thank you...
You create quickly RC update just for fun or what ?
Now I'm back to Opera 12.16... I quit Vivaldi until you are sure the browser is "entirely" functional... not before...
Good bye -
I'm looking more forward to sync than mail, but I'm guessing we'll see either one or both on 2.0.
-
Some support pre-exists at webmail.vivaldi.net however as of now I would REALLY love to see this built-in as a web panel…
-
I figured something out… If you move the cursor next the tiny crack in between the url and search. You can resize them giving you more room. This is a complete work around but it is what it is.:twisted:
-
Startup times see somewhat on par with chrome… However I see what you mean if you have vivaldi not run during background it takes 30-40 seconds for me..
Ubuntu 16.04
Intel i5.If there is any difference on Windows I will update this post later. If I don't forget I will try later :lol:
-
Not as easy to implement as you might imagine. And with some rather large and much higher priority projects in front of them, since private window exists, private tabs are unlikely to be high priority soon.
-
We can't replicate this at the moment. What sort of system are you on? Where do you live? When this was happening all the time to certain users, especially on Mac, it was found to be geo-sensitive - particular to certain places in Europe and the version of Google that was being served there. It would be good to know more of your circumstances.
-
This is happening on a 13" Early-2011 MacBook Pro running OS X Yosemite 10.10.5 and I am in Delaware, USA.
-
I took a little time to look at Stable 1.6 settings etc. today.
Viv has so many features ( a lot I'll never use or didn't think I would ) like Scheduled Themes. But no… that feature is SO GREAT easier on eyes. I wish someone would make it cut blue out at night like program flux does for PC. Flux seems to be a flaky program now..maybe extension.Just thanks I think it is very stabe now and most problems I have can be attributed to a cloud backup program that crashed a long time ago.
-
@Kanay:
Hello and thanks for the answer, yes i read about it, still is something that is out of place when it comes to development priorities for me, see above too for longer answer.
Thank you.
I don't see why some downvote a person for their ideas or comments if it suggests something other than party line every time. Makes no sense or thought.
-
Thanks!
-
I don't see why some downvote a person for their ideas or comments
He's not downvoted for his ideas, he is downvoted for his attitude, whining tone, and insistence. It's not the first time he posts this rant, and it has been explained before that designers do this, no development resources are misplaced.
Most users likely don't use Philips Hue feature either, probably never will, but they aren't constantly rubbing it in the developers face, who work so hard to bring us this wonderful browser.
<wild speculation="">They probably even made some sort of deal with Philips and got payed for implementation. Developers have to eat too, and financially managing a free project is not easy</wild>
-
Yes, but that was never necessary before. Plus, the URL field is already cramped enough in some cases, particularly on https sites where you get a VERY wide badge with a site name taking up a lot of space (like the very one we're on now).