• Browser
  • Mail
  • News
  • Community
  • About
Register Login
HomeBlogsForumThemesContributeSocial

Vivaldi

  • Browser
  • Mail
  • News
  • Community
  • About

Navigation

    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    We will be doing maintenance work on Vivaldi Translate on the 11th of May starting at 03:00 (UTC) (see the time in your time zone).
    Some downtime and service disruptions may be experienced.
    Thanks in advance for your patience.

    1. Home
    2. Mail, Calendar & Feeds
    3. Mail, Calendar & Feeds Feature Requests
    4. Add mail account without SSL/TLS

    Add mail account without SSL/TLS

    Mail, Calendar & Feeds Feature Requests
    mail
    16
    35
    3.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      mracz @gmg
      last edited by

      @gmg Of course an option MUST be given to the user NOT TO USE SSL/TLS for a connection. Vivaldi makes here a decision instead of a user as if the developers of Vivaldi were educated in Redmond. Shame on you.

      WildEnte
      W
      1 Reply Last reply
      Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mracz
        last edited by mracz

        Many of us use own IMAP servers or an authenticated secure method to connect to a network with an IMAP server. A decision to not to provide an option to the user to have a connection to the IMAP server without security may have an educational purpose but serious people perhaps do not need to be educated by developers of Vivaldi. I think a missing option for defining access to an IMAP/SMTP server with NO security is a serious drawback for Vivaldi. Not because no security might sometimes still be safe but because the developers of Vivaldi here make a decision instead of the user, which in a world outside Microsoft Windows not the developers but the user should make alone.

        And yes, no security may still be safe.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • WildEnte
          W
          WildEnte Soprano Patron @mracz
          last edited by

          @mracz welcome to the forum.

          Imagine going to a party where drinks are served for free, taking the mike and shouting "the music sucks, shame on you!"

          You may have a point, but in most cases you won't be the hero.

          Usually on Win11 running Vivaldi Snapshot builds. Opinionated about working efficiently with email. Folders are evil | Mail workflow: receive, read, reply, mark as read, done.

          M
          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mracz @WildEnte
            last edited by

            @WildEnte Well I appreciate all the hard works and all the saints but the issue here is not what needs to be developed further, but rather to let the user set up his own security. I am leaving now this party because the drink offered here to me was consumed at once by someone else. Cheers!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              LongTimeUser @gmg
              last edited by

              @gmg said in IMAP (PORT 143 without SSL/TLS):

              @Fabri69
              We don't support plaintext authentication for security purposes. Is this for a localhost server?

              It makes sense to protect 99% of the users from accidentally using unencrypted remote servers, especially over WIFI and other public networks.

              But one further usecase for having unencrypted authentication (plain old POP3/IMAP protocol) support is for local spam proxies like PopFile, some of which do not support encryption. In these cases, there should be no security issues if you restrict the unencrypted connections to localhost/127.x.x.x.

              T
              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply Quote 0
              • pafflick
                P
                pafflick moved this topic from Mail on
              • MoiraPrime
                M
                MoiraPrime
                last edited by

                Ability to use STARTTLS would be great. ProtonMail's bridge requires this to work.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • T
                  tps800 @LongTimeUser
                  last edited by

                  @LongTimeUser
                  There is quite an other use case: Exchange: locked down to only MAPI. You'll need some tools to translate MAPI to IMAP, SMTP, calendar, and address book access. Not to mention all the push things Exchange allows and which have to be translated too (most of them have IMAP equivalents).

                  Most of these tools do not implement encryption -- would not make sense: encrypt, decrypt while communicating over local sockets only. What a waste of CPU time.

                  Whoever is able to grab communication on local sockets, will be able to do anything, because this one already has compromised your local system.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JoergP
                    J
                    JoergP
                    last edited by

                    Would love to connect to my corporate account using DAVMail (https://davmail.sourceforge.net/index.html). It works very well with my Thunderbird setup, but I'm lost in setting this up in Vivaldi Mail because there is no choice of setting an imap server without SSL/TLS.

                    mossman
                    M
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply Quote 0
                    • mossman
                      M
                      mossman Ambassador @JoergP
                      last edited by

                      @JoergP I've seen DAVmail mentioned a couple of times and would also like to try this to back-up my wife's company mail (used to be accessible with IMAP, now it's only visible through webmail or Outlook on Android).

                      Do you have any experience getting DAVmail to work with the latest annoying login methods? In my wife's case (outlook.com/owa/[company name]) she has to enter a username and password, then gets an authentication screen prompting to type a number on her Outlook app (which doesn't seem able to do this), so she has to go to "alternative" methods and select to get an SMS code instead. I'm very curious if DAVmail is able to handle this utter fustercluck of a login procedure...

                      JoergP
                      J
                      HarryFox
                      H
                      2 Replies Last reply
                      Reply Quote 1
                      • JoergP
                        J
                        JoergP @mossman
                        last edited by

                        @mossman I'm afraid I can't speak to that. Our corporate mail doesn't use TFA so far.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • HarryFox
                          H
                          HarryFox @mossman
                          last edited by

                          @mossman said in Add mail account without SSL/TLS:

                          @JoergP I've seen DAVmail mentioned a couple of times and would also like to try this to back-up my wife's company mail (used to be accessible with IMAP, now it's only visible through webmail or Outlook on Android).

                          Do you have any experience getting DAVmail to work with the latest annoying login methods? In my wife's case (outlook.com/owa/[company name]) she has to enter a username and password, then gets an authentication screen prompting to type a number on her Outlook app (which doesn't seem able to do this), so she has to go to "alternative" methods and select to get an SMS code instead. I'm very curious if DAVmail is able to handle this utter fustercluck of a login procedure...

                          Same here. I want to use vivaldi mail at work with exchange protocol through davmail. But it fails at adding account because of SSL/TLS.

                          Is there any bug/feature request?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • P
                            perditavojo Translator Patron
                            last edited by perditavojo

                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • eporte
                              E
                              eporte
                              last edited by

                              With a pro type outlook OWA account and a personal account with protonmail... I literally can't use vivaldi mail and that's a real shame.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • M
                                michaa7
                                last edited by

                                @developers

                                DO NOT patronize your customers.

                                Did it never occur to you that fumbling around with selfsigned certificates (which would "solve" the ssl problem) is way more prone to faults and therfore for security issues than using IMAP without ssl within the users LAN (to be FORCED to use ssl when the server IP is 127.0.0.1 or 192.168.x.x is very close to pure idiocy) . So your whole stance regarding security is bogus and blind.

                                Get your act together an enable IMAP without ssl. Do it until yesterday!!!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • burnout426
                                  B
                                  burnout426 @gmg
                                  last edited by

                                  @gmg said in Add mail account without SSL/TLS:

                                  @Fabri69
                                  We don't support plaintext authentication for security purposes. Is this for a localhost server?

                                  Maybe allow it via a flag or typing thisisunsafe in the settings dialog like you can do for Chromium SSL error pages. Or, a command-line switch.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  Loading More Posts
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • 1
                                  • 2
                                  • 2 / 2
                                  • First post
                                    Last post

                                  Looks like your connection to Vivaldi Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.

                                  Copyright © Vivaldi Technologies™ — All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Code of conduct | Terms of use | Vivaldi Status