No, Google! Vivaldi users will not get FloC’ed.
-
Humans could now be defined as sheep. I for one have no desire to be in a FLoC about to be fleeced.
Money the root/route of all evil.
Viva VIVALDI. -
@guigirl said in No, Google! Vivaldi users will not get FloC’ed.:
@mossman said in No, Google! Vivaldi users will not get FloC’ed.:
TV ad
What's that?
Fair enough...
cleaning products
What's that?
Ewww!
-
Thanks, Vivaldi team!
-
It is exactly for stances like these that I am a Vivladi user and will likely remain so going into the future. Thanks you for your efforts.
-
In Viv We Trust!
-
Also WordPress will block Google FloC just like DuckDuckGo and Brave:
-
@guigirl Same in Windows:
Directory of C:\Users\loren\AppData\Local\Vivaldi\User Data\Floc\1.0.5
03/18/2021 12:48 PM <DIR> .
03/18/2021 12:48 PM <DIR> ..
03/18/2021 12:48 PM 66 manifest.fingerprint
03/18/2021 09:23 AM 122 manifest.json
03/18/2021 09:23 AM 182,872 SortingLshClusters
03/18/2021 12:48 PM <DIR> _metadata
3 File(s) 183,060 bytesSortingLshClusters is rather opaque...
!! ` ! !!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!` !!a`` !! ` !!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!" !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ` !!!!!! ! ! !! !!!!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!! ` !!!! !! !!!! !! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!"!!!!!!!!""""!!!!!!!!!!"""!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!!!!""!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!""!!!!""!!!!""!!!!""!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!! ! !!a!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!a!! !!!!!a !!! !!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! !!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!! ! !!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!! !!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!"!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!"""!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!"!!""!!!!"!!""""!!!!!!!!""""!!!!""!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!!!!""!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!! !"!!!!!!"!!!!!!"!!""""!!!!"!!""""!!!!""! ``` !!` ` _ !!__ !` !!` _ _` __ !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ` !``` aa``` ` ____` !!__ ` ` !!` ` ___` __ _ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! !! !! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!! !! ! !!! !! !!! ^ !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!! !!! "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! ! !!! !""""!!!!!!!!!!"!!"!!!!!!!!!!!!"aa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!""""!!!!"!!!!"""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!""""!!!!"!!!!!!""!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!"!!""!!!!""!!!!""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!` !! !!! _ !
(Lots more of that...)
Mine is over 5 times as big as yours, and 12 days older... Does it grow with time?
Looks like it was modified before it was created, and hasn't been changed since:
Hard to guess what it might mean...
Checked my Arch - has the Floc dir, but it is empty.
drwx------ 2 loren loren 4096 Oct 10 2020 FlocStill on Viv 3.6.2165.40, I need to update... But it is working fine.
-
Gurgel developers and employees must take FLoC alone to spy on themselves, if they have such an urge to spy on people! :-p
-
@LorenAmelang , same
-
-
-
@guigirl said in No, Google! Vivaldi users will not get FloC’ed.:
I loved this:
We believe in a future where the web can provide people with privacy, transparency and control while also supporting responsible business models to create a vibrant, open and diverse ecosystem. Like Google, we support solutions that give users clear consent, and do not bypass consumer choice
Hahaha, onya microsoft, you've still got your legendary comedic touch!
Haha I was about to say the same thing! Newspeak at its finest! I find it somewhat amusing that they dare even say this, given that Goggle and Microshaft are possibly the very worst offenders of all time regarding dark patterns, no meaningful consent, and bypassing consumer choice (although arguably Amazon and Facecrook are also pretty bad in this regard).
-
@guigirl My work computer (Linux Mint Debian Edition) has the same files with exact same filesizes present. The date is slightly different but probably just relates to whenever I updated V. The _metadata/ dir contains a single json file that's 1.8k in length. All last accessed April 11th. I suspect the Floc processing files get created ready to be used, but if the code's disabled, they never get updated. Otherwise we'd surely not see exactly the same file lengths on two different systems with different usage patterns.
Haven't checked my personal (Gentoo and Devuan) boxes yet. I might see if I can find a Losedows computer to look at, to see if that has a Floc dir too.
-
How about supporting FLoC API but always using hardcoded FLoC group "69" or "31337"? That way servers wouldn't block Vivaldi for missing FLoC support but in worst case all Vivaldi users were considered a single identity.
FLoC API provides no way for the 3rd party servers to know if the FLoC group id is real or not.
Another nice option would be to use seconds since UNIX epoch as the FLoC id. All Vivaldi users would use one global id which is changed every second. Good luck trying to recover any data out of that from the 3rd party server log.
-
@Catweazle said in No, Google! Vivaldi users will not get FloC’ed.:
"I think that in general the ads are overvalued, "
Don't let the advertisers hear that!!!
Where else will the ad agency's be able to make a living??? -
@GearDoc47 ,with a decent job, perhaps?
-
@jamesbeardmore
Ah, the alternative truth we have heard recently in the USA........ -
@mtrantalainen I think the main use case for faking FloC is to prevent fingerprinting. ( We need to blend in with the flock)
I don’t think websites will be able to block you for having FloC disabled, Trust Tokens, yes, but not FloC.
Changing every second is a bad idea, too fingerprint able.
One cohort for all Vivaldi users could work, but there are only 2 M V users.
The best answers are probably having a random cohort that changes each session, or the empty cohort. The empty cohort is for those whose cohorts would convey sensitive info.
-
@jane-n Could you be more specific on what will be disabled? Wouldn’t disabling the FloC API make V users too fingerprintable? Wouldn’t disabling Trust Tokens be a very bad idea?
-
It is a no FLoCin way from me also
This post is quoted in The Register https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/14/browser_makers_reject_google_floc/
Also "WordPress core contributor proposes treating Google FLoC as a security vulnerability" https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/19/wordpress_core_contributor_proposes_treating/