Arching Vivaldifarians.
-
@npro ... and pipewire
-
@npro said in Arching Vivaldifarians.:
Then downloaded the version with GNOME, which worked.
So I made a right decision to install GNOME version, right?
-
@Stardust From Solus Budgie to Fedora? Another one bites the dust .
Don't know, according to that review probably no
According to me there's no such thing as a DE based on GTK -they 're all invisible to me- so I guess this counts also as another no
-
-
@Stardust Which is the same, that is the first sign that the road is paved already
-
@TbGbe said in Arching Vivaldifarians.:
and pipewire
@npro said in Arching Vivaldifarians.:
known popper is using systemd-boot
Now lookee here, you two cyberbullies. Not all of us are brave enough to live constantly on the bleeding edge like you two. I mean, geeeeez, next you'll be telling me that you also use Snappies not Stables! Where does it end? [Gentoo, ofc].
In my real Arch i use the LADSPA PA EQ, which i really love for its transformative audio improvements. Several times historically, i tried the alternative of PulseEffects, but despite its EQ UI looking excellent, the bastard never once actually improved the audio output. Now i see there's EasyEffects, explicitly for Pipewire, so logically that's the next thing i need to try [initially in VMs]. Simply put though, if i cannot be assured of at least as good an EQ in PW as in PA, i ain't gonna change.
-
-
@TbGbe Yeah, i know... but that fact didn't fit with the theme i was pushing. Now you've totally ruined the vibe, you doity rat.
-
@guigirl "Top of the world!"
-
@TbGbe Heehee, i pretty much figured you'd enjoy the bait i offered you. I for one simply choose to ignore that he never actually said those exact words [sans-others in-between]. Sometimes the Myth is better than the Truf!
-
On The Metaphysics Of Arch Linux - Is Ezarcher Arch Linux?
I agree with him, but also agree that Arch "purists" will always disagree.
Btw; for anyone who chooses to watch this, you'll probably want to increase the playback speed to at least 1.5X. I enjoy laconic, but don't have time for semi-catatonic.
-
@guigirl said in Arching Vivaldifarians.:
I for one simply choose to ignore that he never actually said those exact words
Errr... Yes he did - prefixed with "Made it Ma," but no others-in-between.
-
@guigirl 1.5x speed is a very good advice actually
Now, I've only watched a little to the point he was talking about the script, and... frankly I'm not that interested to watch the rest, to me things are simple, currently there are two official ways to install Arch and get support for it, the diy way following the official guide and the official script, anything else is not Arch as it is not official. Hope I covered the rest of the video
-
@TbGbe Ahhhhhh, until i followed your link i was puzzled by your reply in the negative. Having now watched that snippet, i realise we were at cross purposes. My "trigger bait" was intended to be
you doity rat
which from our older repartee i knew you'd pick up on as a Cagneyism. When you posted your reply i was thrilled, coz i [mis]understood it to be your signal that you'd indeed recognised said Cagneyism... not coz he used that phrase in that movie, but simply coz it was him. Hence, my subsequent post referred to my original "trigger bait", not to your reply, & was simply my tacit acknowledgement that i do know the cultural fallacy of those literal three words, whereas ofc we know he never did say them, apart from with some other words in between.
Having now had to explain it, i quite regret the whole thing & wish i'd just said nothing... albeit that usually seems impossible for moi.
-
-
@npro said in Arching Vivaldifarians.:
Hope I covered the rest of the video
No, that isn't his point or objective. He's simply engaging in the eternal debate of whether anyone who installs Arch
!=TAW
is entitled to claim they are using Arch, vs an Arch-based distro [not not NOT things like MJ, EOS, Arco, ArchLabs etc all of which are ABDs, but explicitly methods like his way, ArchGUI, or Archfi, each of which latter three are based exactly on TAW but simply with some semi-automation]. -
@guigirl ok so the answer is the same, as they are not official you're not installing Arch the official way, so support in the official forums is theoretically not granted.
-
@npro I rest my case.
-
@guigirl said in Arching Vivaldifarians.:
When you posted your reply i was thrilled, coz i [mis]understood it to be your signal that you'd indeed recognised said Cagneyism
Correct, I did!
my original "trigger bait"
Oops - my mistake, not yours
-
Some time ago in this
Highly Esteemed Thread
, we chatted a little about LXQt. I created an Arch LXQt VM back then to appraise the newest shiniest v1.1.0, & quite liked it.Also earlier in this HET there was some deranged chat about Fedora Branched, with some lunatic converting one of her existing F36 VMs to Branched, which ipso facto is now at F37.
Ever since those chats, said loony has been interested to evaluate how Fedora might deploy their LXQt [i mean natively; i'm not interested enough to manually do it myself from first principles]. Each few weeks i check to see if it [1.1.0] exists anywhere within the Fediverse. Alas, still to this moment... nada:
That's simply pathetic. Don't they want my money? I'm all cashed-up & ready to pay up to 700% on the retail price.