Increase Max Width of Vertical Tab Bar
-
@Tinsmith Thanks for the detailed description! If I feel a strong urge for a width above 386 px, I'll make sure to give it a try!
-
@simokron Thanks! I like this method because it doesn't set the width of the tab bar, but increases the limit instead. The tab bar itself remains resizable.
-
@Tinsmith That is definitely a nice bonus!
-
@simokron said in Increase Max Width of Vertical Tab Bar:
This just became essential with the introduction of two-level stacking.. The solution proposed by @potmeklecbohdan makes the tabs wide, but not the bar itself for me. Any update on this?
Exactly this. How is it possible that a browser that supports two vertical tab bars side by side also limits them to a 100 px each? In a world with 4K monitors? Absurd.
-
@Tinsmith Just tried that, works like a charm! (Until the next update...)
-
@Tinsmith: Tried your
bundle.js
hack and it did unlock the tab bar, but the change is only for the entire bar (i.e. the main tab stack is still limited to 260px). This is going to work fine for me, since I decided to just widen the bar a bit and make the first tab bar collapse to favicons when inside a stack, but it is very silly.You can't see anything when the default bar is split in two. I guess they are pushing people to a top tab bar, but the left side makes way more sense with (ultra)wide monitors when you want to see more of the tab names. oh well
-
@dfleisch , I agree with you. This method is far from ideal. I rarely use two-level stacking, so it is somewhat tolerable trade off for me.
I don't know if Vivaldi moderators read it, but the proper solution here is to stop reverse engineering
bundle.js
. Instead, relax the limit!Maybe many years ago, when Vivaldi just started, the 1024x768 resolution was mainstream and 260px looked kind of OK. But now this limit is just too narrow for modern screens.
BTW, this limit is applied in other places. For example, "Any command" window (Ctrl+E). It is fixed width window of 260px, which often too narrow to see entire title of historic pages, so it is impossible to pick the right page.
-
@Tinsmith with introduction of subtabs bar look for 230 px also. Because after opening that subtabs bar they have wide width but main tab bar have fixed with = 230 px.
@OperaDevs - And even after fixing that fixed 230 px I was disappointed with that subtabs bar behavior. It's opening "eats" main tab bar space not page, so you need to have very wide main tab bar to have readable subtabs bar width. -
-
@potmeklecbohdan My mistake. VivaldiDevs
-
+1, this would be a really good feature. Current width limit is far too small, only reason I can think of for this limit is to avoid issues when the window is resized to have a smaller width than the tab bar.
On my machine, the minimum width for the browser window is about 500~550px. However, when I activate something from the side panel (bookmarks, downloads, etc) the browser seems to resize the tab bar just fine.
-
@Vivaldi please remove the size limit. If i want to make it 90% of my window size, i should be able to do so. This limitation is one of the biggest downsides since i started using Vivaldi right after the first release.
-
Just adding my voice to ask for this too. Setting any pixel limit on this (to me anyway) makes absolutely no sense.
Why can't it just be allowed to open quite literally to the entire width of the browser window if people wish to?
Admittedly yes that wouldn't be of much use to anyone as then how do you see the browser page however if it had no physical hard stop limit set to 260 or whatever then people with large monitors / resolutions would be able to drag it out to whatever width they like and all the browser has to do is remember what width they dragged to.
If the user doesn't want it too large then it's totally up to them to just set it to whatever width they want surely? If the browser remembers where they've set it then this surely doesn't put anyone out at all and caters for all users?Please do put me correct if this would cause issues for any users as I have honestly wracked my brains and can't think of any reason why it would?
Thank you in advance for considering this.Best wishes,
Mark
-
@markbowendesign , thank you for your reply and vote. These are precisely my thoughts, as well. I suspect that the initial limit of 260px was set by omission because vertical tabs were not the first priority and for horizontal tabs it doesn't matter anyway. Then later, once people started complaining, the problem didn't gather much public interest and that's why the company assigned low priority to the request.
Frankly, I think the fix for this is trivial. Just set the max to the width of the screen and it'll work for everyone.
Probably not many people are even aware of the vertical tabs. I still remember vertical tabs from the ancient days of Netscape Navigator. They were very useful even then! However, younger people may have never experienced vertical tabs. That may explain low interest.
-
@Tinsmith Thank you for sharing
-
Just upgraded to Vivaldi 3.7.2218.45 . A lot of improvements! However, the vertical tab bar width is still limited to 260 pixels.
Bumping up the topic. -
@Tinsmith said in Increase Max Width of Vertical Tab Bar:
Just upgraded to Vivaldi 3.7.2218.45 . A lot of improvements! However, the vertical tab bar width is still limited to 260 pixels.
Bumping up the topic.I did too, and faced the same disapointement.
Is it a complex issue to fix for the devs, or is it just not having enough atttention ? (I have no skills in CSS nor dev, so I can't state how difficult it is to lift this limitation)NB: See also this thread on the same subject.
-
Vivaldi Developers: Please either remove the current width limit of the vertical tabs area or let us specify a custom value for it.
-
We should be able to increase the overall size as well. With a 4K monitor both width and height is too small.
-
Just received the 3.8 update. The browser is getting better overall, which is good.
However, this silly limit of 260 pixels width for the vertical tab bar is still there.
Bumping up the topic.