Chromium 70 update – Vivaldi Browser snapshot 1322.4
-
@rtransformation: No, but 2.1 will be based on Chromium 70 and we hope we do not have to wait long with that release at all.
-
@cqoicebordel: Yes, we are back on track and long may that continue. That update was a pain, but the latest updates have been a lot lighter, giving us more time to work on other stuff, both features and long standing pet issues.
-
Hi there, thanks for another SS. One issue I found just now: There seem to be a problem with an specific image format. In the middle of an article (https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Zahlen-bitte-500-Millionen-Mark-pro-Monat-der-Zusammenbruch-der-DDR-4179952.html?seite=all) there is a b/w image of Honecker and Gorbachev shaking hands. In FF the image shows perfectly fine whereas in Viv (this latest SS 32bit) I only see some bilinear filtered mega pixels. Anyone else got this?
@Germans: have a nice holiday tomorrow^^
@everyone else: have a nice day tomorrow^^! -
@fendar Same image quality in FF and last SS for me (but I'm under 64bit - don't know if this might be the reason).
-
@fendar Confirmed here. IrfanView opens the image saved from Firefox and tells me that it is a JPEG Progressive image. After saving from Firefox, it uploads OK here.
Specs: AMD A10-6800K, 8 Gb on Win 10 64-bit build 17134,286 • Snapshot 2.1.1322.4 (64-bit)
-
@Fendar
The image served to Vivaldi is actually a 10Kb WEBP with extension JPEG, and it's even smaller, 610x419.
FF doesn't support WEBP I guess, so the actual 100Kb JPEG (786x540) is served.
You can see the different url served with dev tools or with View page source. -
@ornorm: well, strangely I cannot reproduce the error anymore. It showed me the image error every time no matter if I had extensions activated or not. [Ctrl][F5] made no difference. When loading the image address separately the result was a plain white image. As I said, in FF everything loaded just fine. Now, an hour later, the problem is gone in Viv. Well...
-
@fendar Well... Vivaldi is full of (good) surprises
Happy to know your problem is fixed now (I hope you won't encounter it anymore). -
The page load progress bar inside the address bar seems to be not working...
-
Same. The addressfield pageload-indicator appears to only display at the last inch of the addressfield, or the space where the pageload-progress text resides.
-
@pesala said in Chromium 70 update – Vivaldi Browser snapshot 1322.4:
Confirmed here.
This morning, the image is now displaying correctly.
-
@pafflick Also notice that the change in fonts caused an unalignment.
-
I have a problem with native notifications. They don't seem to work. I can't be sure it's the new Vivaldi snapshot, because I performed a (clean) install of Win10 RS5 earlier today. Then a clean install of Vivaldi, synced my settings, enabled the Enable native notifications flag, restarted, and Youtube notifications (set to Push only) appear like normal ones, not inside the Action Center.
With RS4 and the previous snapshot I'd get them normally in the action center. Am I doing anything wrong here or something changed?
Thanks! -
@brunnopleffken: Same here. No grey loading animation on macOS.
-
@stevekong: Unfortunately it's not reliable: If I move to another desktop while Vivaldi starts up or if I switch to another application during startup, windows still do not open maximized. All on Mac. Should I report that as a separate issue?
-
This is very annoying regression since 1.15: silent forced exit of browser on closing particular pages of SAP NetWeaver web portal.
-
@13-beta2: true for both stable and ss
-
@t0yz I've never investigated it, but for me, the notifications were never appearing in the action center. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I use a standalone installation of Vivaldi, but to be honest - I have no idea.
Using Vivaldi Vivaldi Stable 2.0.1309.29 (64-bit) on Windows 10 ver. 1803 (x64).
-
What a terrible(!) update, at least for me. Fortunately I made a backup before upgrading so I can easily compare startup on 1317.4 and 1322.4 with the same tabs. I have about 50 tabs open.
First thing is that all the tabs containing videos now start playing long before the page rendering is complete and I can mute or stop those tabs. It also takes much longer before the browser starts responding which corresponds to the screenshot below, showing cpu load, where the first and last peaks belong to the startup of 1317.4 and the middle two to 1322.4 (and remain at 100% load longer than the other ones). Also, after loading cpu-load remains at about 30% with 1322.4 but drops to below 10% (of which some will be other processes) with 1317.4Memory usage for 1322.4 is also about 3 GB higher (out of my total 16 GB) than with 1317.4:
-
@marcos-ps: Confirmed. Mildly annoying change if indeed intentional.