goodness me vivaldi, how much did this sponsorship cost you?
-
@Pathduck yes, i knew that [having watched the full ep, twice], but nonetheless in the still-pic i posted, the light-trick & view angle is such that it instantly grabbed my attention as a pseudo snappie logo.
btw, just in case possibly
nobody
realised, i did not for one second seriously think some sponsorship nor ad deal had happened; my thread title was intended to be heavily [& obviously] ironic.prolly that's the price one pays for being just a noob here, peeps don't yet grasp one's warped humour
-
@ybjrepnfr That's me - breaking everyone's hopes and imaginations on the cold hard rocks of logic
-
@Pathduck That is in reality a hook, for wardrobe, the Doctor's, in the TARDIS.
-
@ybjrepnfr When you think no one gets you but instead you donβt get anybody else ^^
-
@luetage by the law of mathematical commutation, tis identical.
-
@ybjrepnfr
This was certainly not cheap for Vivaldi.But, as you can see, it was once again worth it for Vivaldi.
Vivaldi does this, undercover, more often.
But only the sighted can see -
professor emeritus anne elk told me that she has another theory. ahem, ahemhemhem. she said that, ahem, vivaldi only paid for the frames between 02:52 & 03:00 to be replaced with the snappie logo, which is why in all subsequent parts of the video it's clearly just the boring inverted triangle.
apparently she also has theories regarding grassy knolls, & moon landings.
-
@ybjrepnfr
2:52 to 3:00, CET (MEZ)? ? -
@ingolftopf those are the timestamps in the video; mm:ss.
-
@ybjrepnfr
The question was not meant seriously.