Chocolatey Install Fails Error 7
-
Installing independently of Chocolatey is not an option. Please work with them to figure out what is wrong and fix it. Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit.
See attached image
-
I am not familiar with Chocolatey at all; but it may help you and the Vivaldi team to supply the output of the mentioned log files to see if they offer any clues as to why the installation fails.
Also just as a note, Vivaldi does not actually offer a "portable" version. While Vivaldi can be saved in a standalone folder, and it will run with no installation, Vivaldi will still create registry keys and save settings in user-specific folders. So the idea of a Vivaldi "(portable)" Chocolatey package is somewhat intriguing to me; but as I said, I have no familiarity with Chocolatey.
-
@crimsonshade the output is as extensive as what you see here, nothing more is available in the raw logs. Chocolatey is available to the public so not sure why I have to be involved
-
@gwen-dragon no, I don't have to do anything at all. YOU would be well advised to sort it out. There is absolutely no upside for me in this pathetic mess. Just fix it, or don't. I don't care at all. And also, what in the world how much hubris do you have to have to demand that people you are trying to sell an idea to work to debug your own product. Like, O tragedy - where in the world could I possibly find another web browser that works? Lol what a fail.
-
@hoohost said in Chocolatey Install Fails Error 7:
Please work with them to figure out what is wrong and fix it
Just do a feature request to support choco package. But should be reported to the actual maintainers too.
Also, the 3.7 is quite old nowadays (we are on 4).May I ask why a win user need to use a repackaged app? In which is different from paf archives or a standalone install of vivaldi? Also, this package is really portable or it turns out which is actually still standalone? (Chromium based browsers are not really portable as some data are encrypted at machine level, so they'll lost when the copy of the app is moved outside of that).
-
beside of the portable part.
A version over chocolatey would be really great because you can really simple create e.g. a update script who can run on system start and update all software and you dont have to think about is your browser actual or not. and its in my opinion a little bit annoying that i get an message with hey a new version is available, dann have to say yes i want to update, dann i have to wait until its downloaded, than i have to restart.... with choco its as simple as choco update -all. and finish. all programms who got installed over chocolatey get updatet. beside of that these is really usefull if you have a new installed system and you can simple install chocolatey, dann start your script with: choco install programmA programmB programmC .... -y and all get installed and you can wait until a few minutes later all programms you want (and who are available in chocolatey) are installed and you dont have to search a installation of every i dont know 20-30 programms or so you want to have on the web.... these makes it so mutch easier especially when you dont want to use edge.Greetings
-
I have been trying to download manimce, so I tried to download it with chocolatey. But it is giving me error. It says-Error: The running command stopped because the preference variable "ErrorActionPreference" or common parameter is set to blahblah. stop: cannot find path 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Python\Pythoncore' because it does not exist. By the way my pc is windows 7 sp1. How can I fix it?
-
Ppafflick unlocked this topic on -
Ppafflick moved this topic from Vivaldi for Windows on
