LonM last edited by pafflick
It would be fantastic if we could support extension installation on a mobile version.
Not all extensions would work on mobile, of course, but some could.
Potentially allowing for synced extension settings through Vivaldi sync for any extensions that work on android.
GoldNoway last edited by
@lonm Should Vivaldi mobile support extensions from Firefox for Android, extensions from Chrome, or a different kind of extension altogether?
I suppose Firefox would be the better choice as there already is an impressive collection of extensions.
LonM last edited by
@goldnoway it really depends on how they're building the app. I assume they are going to use chrome as a base to start on, so to me it makes sense to use the chrome Web store.
Hadden89 last edited by
@lonm chrome android support extensions now?
It was one of the main reasons - other than a huge app and high cpu/ram usage - I've almost never used it.
LonM last edited by LonM
@hadden89 I just tried and it doesn't. But regardless of which source is used (Mozilla or chrome Web store) they both serve Web extensions which have the same basic format.
I guess a fair bit of would be needed in-engine to get hen working either way.
Omsir last edited by
Making Zotero extension work in a mobile browser is on top of my wish list.
Stardust last edited by
I mostly care about Ublock Origin.
Firefox for android supports it.