uBO Lite?
-
-
@Granite1 Not just with each other, they modify the incoming data (websites, scripts, css etc) and can cause problems with operation or display that will be reported as Browser "bugs".
Also the "simple" effect of resource wastage (over lots of tabs & workspaces).Currently still running uBlock Origin.
-
-
-
????
-
@barbudo2005 Still 2 months to decide!
-
And what are the options, if I may ask?
-
@barbudo2005 Don't worry, I have seen your (various posts on Adguard, uBOLite etc.)
-
How reserved you are. So much mystery.
-
Not just with each other, they modify the incoming data (websites, scripts, css etc) and can cause problems with operation or display that will be reported as Browser "bugs".
Thanks for that clarification. I have now turned off Vivaldi's blocker, disabled Adguard, and will run uBO Lite for a while to assess its performance. Then I'll switch to only Adguard to compare.
-
Said:
Then I'll switch to only Adguard to compare.
You will not see any difference because both extensions are effective in blocking ads, including YT.
And I haven't noticed any difference in page load time.
-
@barbudo2005 said in uBO Lite?:
You will not see any difference because both extensions are effective in blocking ads, including YT.
And I haven't noticed any difference in page load time.
If that is the case, is there any reason to use one over the other?
-