Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?
-
No! Vivaldi is on the cutting edge!
-
Out of date, not sure - I think it does have a bit of a mid-2010's vibe to it. The main menu definitely looks dated, maybe due to the file/edit/view headings, compared to other browsers trying to save clicks and having more showing on the first click. Context menu to a slightly lesser degree. Not sure the update has really helped with that though.
In terms of the rest of the UI, it's definitely functional. Not really sure what else can be done, there's only so many ways to interact with a program. Finding places to put an extra button for a feature doesn't give you that many options unless you want to completely change the browser UX... like what Arc is doing.
@Pesala said in Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?:
I agree that Vivaldi is cluttered, very cluttered,
Maybe if you enable every bar, button, sidebar etc. I would imagine most people would click the right option during install for their use case so the browser works best for them and it doesn't overwhelm them with options.
@Pesala said in Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?:
Its wide range of features is what makes it attractive, and there is a long list of over 5,000 feature requests, so at least some users clearly want more.
Yes, but thankfully a bunch of those options won't be a new button, bar or sidebar. A new option in settings that should be a case of enable/disable and then forget about it.
@eskaigarcia said in Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?:
it feels like there's too much happening at the same time.
I think you need to look at what you have enabled/displayed and decide if you actually need them. If it's something that doesn't get used, hide it. That said, i agree, the trash/sync buttons always bugged me, felt very out of place. But as mentioned, where else could they go? They're tab related, so tab bar makes the most sense, but maybe a dropdown?
I'd be curious to know your ideas on what, how you would change things.
-
@eskaigarcia no
-
@7twenty said:
In terms of the rest of the UI, it's definitely functional.
It definitely is, and it much more functional than you'd think when presented with the amount of features it includes. But I still like to think about what could be improved
@7twenty said:
I think you need to look at what you have enabled/displayed and decide if you actually need them. If it's something that doesn't get used, hide it.
I understand how this is a punctual solution but I think that Vivaldi should be great with both a simple / minimalist setup and a poweruser setup that has everything turned on. After all it still is native Vivaldi, it's not like someone added toolbars, extensions or mods that made it less visually pleasing.
@7twenty said:
I'd be curious to know your ideas on what, how you would change things.
I do have some ideas but I wanted to hear other people's opinions and get a good look at references before making any serious sketches. I always attempt to make proper resesarch before spending hours on a design that tries to fix a nonexistent problem haha. I'll remember to tag you whenever I share any ideas on this topic.
-
Not keeping up with the latest trends isn't a huge issue for me - but it's also not exactly refined in its own style.
Some parts come from Chromium, some from GTK so it's not consistent either.
The Mail and RSS reader's layouts and look is especially confusing and, in way "uncomfortable" . -
@voyager1sun said in Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?:
but it's also not exactly refined in its own style.
Completely agree. I feel like most of that "clutter" we've mentioned comes from components that feel out of place. I can't help but feel like some icons don't belong next to each other, the same goes for some menus, dropdowns and dialongs that have a style that doesn't match up.
@voyager1sun said in Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?:
The Mail and RSS reader's layouts
Yeah, those are a problem for me too. I used the Mail feature a lot because I liked having all my inboxes together, but ended up turning it off because of the UI being uncomfortable. I'd love to go back to it but I would have to mod it first.
-
@eskaigarcia Not really.
I actually don't even get the whole "up to date" versus "out of date" thing, especially when speaking of an interface one can make look any way they want.
My only criteria are whether too much space is consumed by the UI, and whether I can have each function I want just a click away.
For me, the answer to the first criterion is "no," and to the second, "yes." Everything I don't want or need in the UI, I remove. Everything I do want, I place where it will be comfortable for me to access. Then I pick a color scheme and degree of rounding and transparency of elements that strikes my fancy, and go to work. It suits me right down to the ground.
If you want to see "dated," by all means look at Otter Browser. The UI looks like opera did 25 years ago, only more bleak, drab and featureless. I guess it's fast, but it does pretty much nothing I want, so who cares if it does it at lightning speed? I need my functions (email, moveable bars and tabs, customizable appearance, etc.) and I'm flexible as to how they are presented. All else are non-issues to me.
-
@Ayespy your criteria is the exact same as mine.
I want the UI to take up the least space possible, yet still have all the features easily accessible. Vivaldi easily meets these.
-
@Ayespy The up to / out of date thing was just a way to start the conversation. After all the points we're making are more or less all about clutter, ease of use and the cohesiveness of the appearance.
I know Vivaldi isn't dated like Otter and many others. It may not have a "super modern" look but it also isn't dated like that.
-
Arc is my daily driver because of its clean UI and the way it handles profiles (one Arc instance holding multiple profiles).
I know that most of the rest I like about Arc (tab management, sync(?)) can be achieved with Vivaldi as well. I tried Vivaldi because it’s the only decent browser available on Mac, Android, iOS and Linux, but it was A LOT of work to make it look and feel like Arc. And Stella then I got stuck at having multiple instances of Vivaldi open to support my different profiles. -
@Toontje One might wonder why you didn't use a single instance of Vivaldi with multiple profiles. Certainly, a lot of people do.
-
@Ayespy I did have two profiles configured in Vivaldi (annoying that apart from two Google accounts I also have to have two Vivaldi accounts), but to be able to easily switch I have to have two Vivaldi windows open all the time. Where as in Arc I can just switch profiles within the same window.
Now you are going to say: “But you can do the same in Vivaldi!” I don’t know, I think that the way Arc has implemented it is much more natural, easy, slick, don’t know. Try it and you’ll see what I mean. -
@Toontje I suppose that's an idea, but ARC only installs on Apple devices, of which I have precisely zero, and aside from that, I do not use multiple profiles. Never needed them for anything.
-
@Ayespy Sure. Different use cases different needs.
-
@Ayespy said in Does Vivaldi's UI feel out of date to you?:
@Toontje I suppose that's an idea, but ARC only installs on Apple devices,
Hmm? Running happily on my Windows laptop for a couple of months now Still nowhere near where Vivaldi is in terms of functionality though.
-
@Toontje Yes Arc is great for its UI and for how they've reimagined the way a browser works (which I appreciate a lot as a UI/UX designer) but it's intended for a different type of user. I appreciate the efforts Vivaldi makes towards privacy and the amount of features and personalization that it offers much more than I would appreciate a pretty looking Arc browser.
Arc not being openly available for Windows is another problem too, but I've tried it through the closed beta just to get a good feel of how it handles tabs so I'm not as biased towards Vivaldi while writing this.
-
interesting discussion about the pro and cons of Arc.
https://discuss.techlore.tech/t/what-are-the-communitys-thoughts-on-arc-browser/5064
It seams that Arc itself is reasonable private, except that it send data to it's service provider, and these are Google, Facebook, OpenAI and Microsoft . At the end an user said, that it don't offer more than Vivaldi.
-
@eskaigarcia @oscartorres.io is spot on in the thread mentioned above. Once you are used to the productivity Arc provides it’s very hard to go back to “old-fashioned” browsers.
As for privacy, i appreciate all the effort people are making to become less visible on the internet, but i think this train has passed when we continued to use Google products after they monetised them in 2007. -
-
@Catweazle Oder Android zu verwenden... Oder gleich jeder website mit Google tools zu besuchen...