What is stopping you from using V all the time?
-
i'm loving Vivaldi so far. but for some small features i use everyday, it's still missing a few spots for me like:
Scroll to Top/Bottom option, I use right click + wheel up, but it would conflict with tab cycle. I'd hope for a possible option to customize that tab cycle gesture (or option to disable it).
Do check out FireGestures Extension on Firefox, which has the best customization imo.
Wheel Gestures for instance, lets you set a particular command for Scroll up with holding right-button. There is also an option to add custom User Scripts, for example: to activate LastPass auto fill login hotkey with a Gesture, like for alt+W:
FireGestures.sendKeyEvent({ alt: true, key: "W" });
this would work somewhat like Opera's Wand
which was something I missed alot. some other smaller issues:
[ul]- better support for Chrome extensions like LastPass.
- customizable interface elements, not sure if it'd be possible to move the buttons around like Opera used to/Firefox.
[/ul]
-
- The UI feels sluggish. It seems that every click or every keyboard shortcut anywhere takes a little longer than it should. This is especially noticeable with Speed Dial. I am pretty certain this is related to the HTML-based UI, because neither Chrome nor the new Opera have this feel.
Vivaldi ist currently the slowest browser in existence. Even Mozilla in early alpha wasn't that bad.
I feel the same about sluggishness. It's not slow, but it's not instant, which makes it feel a bit sluggish and that's definitely not something I want from a program that I use the most on a computer.
-
I have horrible interaction with youtube and vivaldi sometimes I click a video and it takes 10s+ for the actual screen to catch up, (nb: vivaldi @ 14% cpu usage, good graphics card unloaded system)
Oddly sometimes I even start hearing the video before I see it!
Os: Windows 10 64bit
CPU: Core i 6600K
Ram: 16G DDR4 @ Forgot clock rate (4G in use) -
Speed. Just went to this page: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/ and thought V had crashed. Turned out it just took 34s to load, and I couldn't scroll for most of that time. Compared to Chrome Version 49.0.2623.112 which took 15s and was 'responsive' to scrolling almost immediately. Looks like javascript is the culprit - see attached timing summaries.
Attachments:
,
-
Speed. Just went to this page: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/ and thought V had crashed. Turned out it just took 34s to load, and I couldn't scroll for most of that time. Compared to Chrome Version 49.0.2623.112 which took 15s and was 'responsive' to scrolling almost immediately. Looks like javascript is the culprit - see attached timing summaries.
No problems here. The page loads in 3/4 seconds for me.
Anyway why detail the chrome version are you using and no word on vivaldi's one?
Are you on the latest snapshot?
-
I use uBlock Origin on "medium mode" from the link you posted. This blocks third-party scripts and frames by default, protecting my privacy but limiting page damage, which is actually all I wanted noscript to do. If that's all you want too, uMatrix is overkill.
Gorhill, the author of both uBlock and uMatrix, recommended medium mode in a post on the wilders security forum awhile back, and I've been using it that way since. Very satisfied.
What's "medium mode" in uBlock Origin? I have the extension, and I don't see any medium mode.
It's on this page, I didn't re-link it because the post I was responding to had it.
-
Lack of Chrome sync. It's basically the only reason I use V as a secondary browser only.
More specifically lack of the ability to sync history and currently open tabs across multiple devices running V under different OS (windows, android and linux at the moment). Saved password sync (as I save a bunch of non-crucial ones) and installed addons/estension would be a great plus, but not essential.
Having them with my google account would be best by far as I don't care having yet another account for a service google already offers and works perfectly. The more I manage to keep with a single account the better. But I might be willing to make another one if I must.
-
Chrome can preview as iPhone/Galaxy etc via developer tools. Vivladi can't
-
-
1. Mainly the incompatible extensions like Hangouts
2. Higher CPU usage than default Chrome, f.e. when using Twitch with the Chrome Flash Plugin.
3. Weird Bookmarks behavior. "Other Bookmarks" category from Chrome is completely missing. Must go into Bookmarks Manager to delete them, can't drag and drop, Vivaldi Crashing sometimes when I try to delete Bookmarks.
4. No popping out of tabs possible -
- Google centrism. I try to be Google free. I go into the settings here and am confronted with all kinds of Google settings. I know Google has a monopoly on good search, but understand not all people are slavishly accepting this, or Google. I am already a bit unhappy to know I am using a browser built on Google code (basically you didn't built a browser, you built a fork), but be a bit more independent.
+1
-
- Google centrism. I try to be Google free. I go into the settings here and am confronted with all kinds of Google settings. I know Google has a monopoly on good search, but understand not all people are slavishly accepting this, or Google. I am already a bit unhappy to know I am using a browser built on Google code (basically you didn't built a browser, you built a fork), but be a bit more independent.
If it's stopping anyone from using Vivaldi, they are wasting their time here. Go back to Firefox or whatever you used before. Vivaldi uses the Chrome/Blink rendering engine as that's the best choice that Jon had. It is not going to change. The Vivaldi browser is much more than its rendering engine, which is why we are all using it.
The default search engine can be changed to whatever you want, and you can add your own searches.
-
Right now, the only time I switch from Vivaldi to Chrome or Firefox, is when a page doesn't work in Vivaldi.
-
@SemillanZ:
I have 2 extensions which have become "primary baseline functionality" on those platforms: NoScript, and Self-Destructing Cookies. Neither of these exist for Chrome/Chromium/Opera/Vivaldi.
And I have not been able to find anything remotely comparable to them, and I've tried quite a few of them. […]
I don't hold any illusion that Vivaldi will build-in any of that functionality, but if I could find a decent and working extension, it would go a long way towards getting me to use it more often.
–---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you could:
1/ use uMatrix for the purpose of blocking scripts. uBlock Origin as an ad blocker. instead of NoScriptThanks for the suggestion.
I use gorhill's uBlock Origin on some of my Gecko/Goanna platforms. But when I first looked at uMatrix, it struck me as obtuse and convoluted to use. I may take another look at it at some point.
The native extension I settled on is ScriptSafe, but it's far from the usability of NoScript. And development was at a standstill for quite a while. BUT! The developer seems to have "returned to life" in the last few weeks and is making updates! Including one of my biggest show-stoppers: every time you 'approved' a script it was only for that specific hostname or subdomain, which made it extremely tedious. Now you can supposedly approve by 2nd-level domain right from the interactive UI, which would be a huge improvement.
It still likes to crash Vivaldi hard when I try to manually edit some of the whitelist entries tho. :blink:
Re: Tab Cookies, I tried that. But it's ancient (last update 2011), and doesn't replicate SDC. I need the ability to whitelist certain cookies, can't do that with that extension, it's "all or nothing". And there are also issues when you have a site open in multiple tabs, as I recall.
-
you could:
1/ use uMatrix for the purpose of blocking scripts. uBlock Origin as an ad blocker. instead of NoScriptI use uBlock Origin on "medium mode" from the link you posted. This blocks third-party scripts and frames by default, protecting my privacy but limiting page damage, which is actually all I wanted noscript to do. If that's all you want too, uMatrix is overkill.
OK, but there are a variety of other things that NoScript does that aren't likely to be part of an engine designed to block ads would do. Like special rules to address things like XSS attacks, blocking of certain types of plugins by default and making them "on demand" (in more granular/convenient ways than the built-in browser capability in that regard, etc. I need to have fine-grained interactive control over scripts.
Ad-blockers, in my experience, if you use a good one with default rule lists, are pretty much "set and forget". Whereas I am constantly interacting with NoScript and adjusting it on each page to give me enough of the essentials without putting me at risk or slowing things down/driving me nuts with scripted annoyances. Does uBlock have such an interactive/popup facility? Maybe uMatrix does, but when I looked at that previously I thought it was a convoluted mess.
-
Yes, uBlock Origin is interactive in the way you describe, in the same way as uMatrix. It's very easy to allow scripts from only domains you want, on a per-site or global basis. The UI is great, immensely better than NoScipt, which I used for years myself.
On "medium mode" it doesn't do everything NoScript does– that is true. But gorhill's argument, which I found compelling, was that his main privacy and security concern was third-party scripts, and medium mode blocks 'em. If you commonly block first-party scripts in NoScript, you can do that too, but my experience is that this breaks EVERY site and is just a huge pain in the butt.
-
Tiny font
Asking for Windows password when trying to show passwords
No user side customization yet - hate the color scheme..
-
Tiny font
Asking for Windows password when trying to show passwords
No user side customization yet - hate the color scheme..
In the new 1.3 snapshot, they added themes that you can customize the color schemes and round the corners if you want as well. So if you're on the Stable channel and don't want to go to the snapshot channel, then stay tuned.
-
Inability to edit the context menu - I am used to opening links in a new background tab via context menu and V does not have this as the top item.
-
Inability to edit the context menu - I am used to opening links in a new background tab via context menu and V does not have this as the top item.
I look forward to being able to edit the menus too.
Meanwhile, I have assigned GestureDown to "Clone Tab in Background Tab | Open Link in Background Tab," as I often use that method in Opera. Middle-click is OK if you have a MMB, Ctrl + Click requires two hands.
