Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?
-
@sjudenim But just so I'm clear, when I'm talking about "harmful lies," it's this kind of thing that I'm talking about.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gabriel-sterling-georgia-trump-violence_n_5fc6b2f8c5b6e4b1ea4f8191
If someone gets hurt, the provocateurs will never be held accountable. So, reasonable curbs on such communications might not be entirely out of order. But, per the purveyors of this stuff, that would be impermissible censoring of their opinions - such as the "opinion" that a certain former government official ought simply to be murdered.
-
https://nlpc.org/2020/04/10/viruses-and-transgenders-twitter-reveals-more-of-its-double-standards/
You have members of congress calling for the accosting of political rivals when out dining, racism directed at certain demographics that are deemed acceptable, antisemitism, misinformation, etc. etc. All unabated by censorship on social media platforms.
Like I said, both sides are guilty but it's funny how this altruism always seems to be so one sided, even in your examples. And there in lies the problem with censorship, it's only as objective as the ones applying it. Which brings us back to the question being asked by the thread starter. Something that I was able to concur with when I tried, as per their request.
-
@dude99 said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:
Anyway, I already got my answer I need, so let's leave this topic to be bury by history.
I might have found you a better answer. Here's an article from Nicole Hao, called "New Search Engine Develops Tech to Display Uncensored Results Without Tracking User Data" The article's behind a paywall, but here's an excerpt:
“We are a fully independent search engine. We have the infrastructure and built the technology from the ground up,” said Steve Smith, a developer at Right Dao. “[We] show the search results, free of manipulation.”
Smith gave an example of searching for the keywords “election fraud.” On the most popular search engines, the results on the first page all describe recent allegations of 2020 presidential election irregularities as unfounded. In contrast, the results Right Dao shows include both negative and positive stories about election fraud [empsises mine].
In short: RightDao.com might be the search-engine you're looking for.
-
@Eggcorn Thank you for your attention & support on this topic.
As of now it should be clear to most sane people that Internet Censorship ain't a "political topic", left or right, democrat or republican have nothing to do with this. It's a matter of freedom of speech, freedom to search & share knowledge, & freedom to make sound decision base on our collective wisdom.
Internet have made these freedom possible for over half-century & we all have benefit greatly from it, but now Internet Censorship initiate by Big Techs are destroying these freedoms. This is akin to another Great Purge happened before us, & we are just witnessing the beginning of it.
My journey & many others like me will scrambling to search for more Alt tech to replace Big tech for a long time. Now we need more than just replace Google & Youtube, then Whatsapp & Facebook, even G.Chrome & Firefox...etc. That's pretty much everything on the Internet!
Well, at least we have Vivaldi, for now... until Google have snuff all the life out of Chromium project! LOL
-
A search engine that, looking for "electoral fraud" in the first place to the assumptions in the US in the last elections, whether positive or negative, is not a neutral search engine. A neutral search engine puts in first place the definition of electoral fraud and historical cases of any country. The US is not the navel of the world.
-
@guigirl HAH!!
-
@guigirl , I also think that it is NOT the navel
-
@Catweazle Careful, there... I live in the US, and have unaccountably tender feelings...
-
@Ayespy , sorry, I'm not talking about the people, but about politics that are harmful to the rest of the world.
-
@Catweazle No need to be sorry. My feelings were not actually injured.
-
@Catweazle said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:
The US is not the navel of the world.
Of course, China is the navel of the world. Cuz that's what it's name means in Mandarin language:
中 = middle or center or central
國 = country or nation or govern landThus, 中國 = Center of the universe!
or some might just call it the "Middle Earth". LOL
-
@dude99 , I am the center of the world, as anyone else is on the surface of a sphere.
-
@Gwen-Dragon , the election was just one example of a generalized manipulation of mainly non-private search engines, which are far from neutral, either due to a so-called filter bubble or political / economic interests.
-
@Catweazle said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:
"A search engine that, looking for "electoral fraud" in the first place to the assumptions in the US in the last elections, whether positive or negative, is not a neutral search engine. A neutral search engine puts in first place the definition of electoral fraud and historical cases of any country. The US is not the navel of the world."
If you're talking about the first search-result:
The first result for "electoral fraud" on Right Dao is the Wikipedia "Electoral Fraud" article. Well, arguably the third result. But that's because, on most Right Dao searches (e.g. love), there's a "Top stories" box at the top with a two news articles. Once you get into the proper search-results, the first result is the Wikipedia article.
However, for "election fraud", the Wikipedia article is the second result. The first result is about the US 2020 election. But considering that this is a very new search-engine (started in 2020), and that it's crawling we web itself instead of using Bing results or something: I think that's forgivable.
-
@Eggcorn , also in Qwant, Metager, Startpage, etc, first result is Wikipedia, next cases in Italy and in history in other countrys, later also US elections.
-
Somewhat related:
I believe that the moment is near when by a procedure of active paranoiac
thought, it will be possible to systematize confusion and contribute to the
total discrediting of the world of reality.
-- Salvador DaliTurned up in a fortune today ^^
-
I tried posting a question in the Github forum today and needed to reword it because it contained a highly offensive word
-
@sjudenim Try "Trump" or "election fraud"...
The previous step is replaced sensitive words within any post with ****** but now they downright denial your post entirely before it's even posted, govern by a poorly functional A.I. LOL
The next step would be proofreading your mind for wrong thoughts before you r allow to touch the keyboard!
You think this sounds like conspiracy & overreact? Just take a look at what happened to the broken Internet under China great firewall. Chinese netizen have to replace sensitive keywords with emojis, weirdly order & split up characters, or even using totally cryptic & encoded text to warn the world about the truth of CCP Virus outbreak last year.
-
@alienprober This is not aging well. #MaricopaAudit
-
If u still think "election fraud is just a conspiracy", take a look at this:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/zach-vorhies-to-target-trump-google-rewrote-its-news-algorithms_3948056.htmlSome "people" botched the Google's search algorithms to discriminate against the orange man, who happen to be the US president & one of presidential candidate at the time! If this ain't treason I don't know what else you can call it. Freedom of Press? But big G denied they are a Publisher... LOL
I have a feeling this is going to be just like the "Wuhan lab virus origin conspiracy", until suddenly some "Fact checker" decided that it's not a conspiracy...