Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?

Zalex108

Start watching Youtube researchers.
Take your Notes and check by yourself.

You can even go further, since some of them just gives some points about something and encourage you to continue investigating.
They even want you to not believe them - research.

Of course,
They can't speak about some things or will receive a Flag, or their channel will be deleted.
Is that new?

Make your research and join the pieces.

--

Youtube is probably worldwide #1 video content, even has a revenue plan.
You can watch it mostly everywhere, devices and Countries.

Since that, is obvious that many people uses it, since long.
But, now, since the big censorship, many people is moving or cloning their video docs to another platforms.

You can search all the info provided by them, what's the problem?

Inmunity for BigPharma against post effects on a Vaccine ¿?
Inmunity for well known corrupt Politicians ¿?
Inmunity for Countries selling armament to Countries in War ¿?
Inmunity for all kind of corruption when you have ~~right~~ contacts

There is even a big document about George Floid, BLM and other stuff

Does NGO fight against the Politics corruption or ask for help, mostly money to do what your taxes should be already be doing since we are on the same Planet, most of our Countries and Ancestors spoiled "foreign" Earth, People, Cultures, Nature, Primary Resources...

The Representants does conversations about the things to fix?
No, they just insults each other, discussing like an UFC Champ.

The problem here is that we all are affected by the wound.

At a Metaphysical level, we All are affected, even them.
At a Material level, just we are.

Eggcorn

@purgat0ri said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

How did I guess that you were getting your information from YouTube?

You're implying that YouTube's an unreliable source. It's not, because YouTube's not a source in the first place. It's a website that hosts videos, anyone can upload to it (well, anyone not banned or censored by Google). The source is whoever made the video. And some of those video-makers are reliable sources, some are not.

Catweazle

@Zalex108 , we are all ignorant of various subjects, nobody knows everything about everything, but a person who has learned to reason, can often use the principle of parsimony to reach a correct conclusion.
I am not a microbiologist, but I know that various measures, such as distance, hygiene and a mask can avoid being infected or infecting others, as they are a logical conclusion. Therefore, those who are not capable of reasoning in this way are those who adapt to the Aristotle quote.

Eggcorn

@Catweazle And you can use that to know that to help you identify what sources are reliable, and what sources are not.

For example: The CDC was, for a while, telling people not to wear masks to protect themselves from the Wuhan virus. They've changed course on that, fortunately. But that they once told people not to wear masks, tells me that they're not a reliable source.

Zalex108

@Catweazle said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

@Zalex108 , we are all ignorant of various subjects, nobody knows everything about everything, but a person who has learned to reason, can often use the principle of parsimony to reach a correct conclusion.
I am not a microbiologist, but I know that various measures, such as distance, hygiene and a mask can avoid being infected or infecting others, as they are a logical conclusion. Therefore, those who are not capable of reasoning in this way are those who adapt to the Aristotle quote.

The problem here is when Virologists explain:

Hole size of the Mask 0,90µ
Virus size 0,0025µ

On Biological hazard they uses a full vest with filters to breath.

Those existing to do the autopsy on this kind of situation, with its room and everything...

Oh! it's forbidden!

--

Hygienic, of course,
It will be very good regarding those people after use the WC.

Even better!!
No shake hands!

Zalex108

@Eggcorn said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

@Catweazle And you can use that to know that to help you identify what sources are reliable, and what sources are not.

For example: The CDC was, for a while, telling people not to wear masks to protect themselves from the Wuhan virus. They've changed course on that, fortunately. But that they once told people not to wear masks, tells me that they're not a reliable source.

Anyone said something about D Vitamin at the beggining?
Knew it since alternative Medicine.

--

Oh!
Fauci two months ago.

--

Oh!
"Alternative" Medicine, that's Scam!
Where the Active Principle of Modern ~~poison~~ medicine comes from?

--

Eggcorn

@Zalex108 Alternative medicine is a scam, for the most part. But there are a few things in alternative medicine, that are actual legitimate medicine. Even a broken clock is right twice per day.

Zalex108

@Eggcorn said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

@Zalex108 Alternative medicine is a scam, for the most part. But there are a few things in alternative medicine, that are actual legitimate medicine. Even a broken clock is right twice per day.

Just was a joke about what many people think.

is a scam, for the most part

Do you mean Alternative medicine or people using something renamed to Alternative medicine to do scams?

Eggcorn

@Zalex108 said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

Do you mean Alternative medicine or people using something renamed to Alternative medicine to do scams?

Both, I guess.

Zalex108

@Eggcorn said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

@Zalex108 said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

Do you mean Alternative medicine or people using something renamed to Alternative medicine to do scams?

Both, I guess.

There could be all kind of experiences, mine are good.

Eggcorn

@Zalex108 @Catweazle @purgat0ri @Ayespy

This is has been a worthwhile conversation. But I'd like to see what page you folks are on, on this thread's original topic: It seems, most search-engines have blacklisted "election fraud" from their search-suggestions. Is that okay, in your book?

Zalex108

@Eggcorn said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

@Zalex108 @Catweazle @purgat0ri @Ayespy

This is has been a worthwhile conversation. But I'd like to see what page you folks are on, on this thread's original topic: It seems, most search-engines have blacklisted "election fraud" from their search-suggestions. Is that okay, in your book?

I don't search using suggestions.

Did a test and saw about the relevant results at the bottom which seems uncommon for something quite specific.

The problem is that on Private Platform, they are in chief about their decisions.
Which has to be accepted.

Despite that,
They can say it clearly "We are from the Dark Side, the Truth will be banned here."

Instead of the kind of responses they use when Ban a Video or a Channel.
If they do that on Youtube, what would happen on GSearches without notification?

Ayespy

@Eggcorn I actually don't care. The only use I make of suggestions is if I see what I was typing appear in the list, and then I click on it to reduce the number of keys I have to strike.

It's not up to Google (or anyone) to suggest to me what I'm going to search. I'm perfectly capable of doing that on my own. The only use for "suggestions" is as a time saver. And in the best of times, it's not all that good at that. But if I start to type "Pennsylvania Corporation Search" and that full search term appears by the time I get to "Pennsylvania cor" then I may click on the suggestion to save time.

Eggcorn

@Ayespy If it were just about the search suggestions themselves, I might agree with you. I suppose my problem is: This stunt, combined with the other stunts big tech has pulled, makes me not trust them. If they're censoring search-suggestions like this, what else are they doing?

An analogy: Imagine you have a co-worker, who always steals other people's lunches. The real problem isn't the missing lunches. The real problem is: Mr. Sticky Fingers might do something much worse then make lunches disappear!

Ayespy

@Eggcorn "Big Tech" is not an entity. It is a panoply of numerous companies with individual policies and individual information practices between them. What they have in common is a desire to maximize profits, and to reap anything they can from everyone they can, and monetize it or sell it. Social manipulation, believe it or not, is scarcely a part of the picture. Leave that to the monied powers whose pure purpose is the preservation of power for its own sake.

I find it completely useless to worry about this fact, any more than I worry about entropy. These are universal, realities of the universe, and not targeted toward me with malice.

What I can do is to adjust my life and my own privacy and information practices to account for the shape of the universe. If/when I am presented with some legislative initiative to change some part of this, I can also educate myself about it and weigh in on one side or the other. What I cannot afford to do is form an opinion concerning the ethics of "Big Tech" (such as it may be imagined to be some amorphous united entity) and generate adrenaline and stomach acid over it. For now, at least, we users have options, and it is sensible for us to make use of them.

When it comes to entropy, I can eat well, exercise, lubricate my machinery, keep vulnerable materials out of the sun, use conditioners on my shoes and other leather goods, etc. It avails me not to rage, rage against the dying of the molecular cohesions in life. One can avoid going gentle into that good dilapidation with perfect equanimity, knowing death can be forestalled, but not defeated.

Eggcorn

@guigirl said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

...in this stupid ill-conceived thread

You think this thread is stupid and ill-conceived? If you think some of the points made here are stupid, that's a different matter. But are you saying that it's stupid ill-conceived, to notice that search-engines are censoring "election fraud" from their search-suggestions? And to ask if anyone knows of a search-engine that doesn't?

Eggcorn

@guigirl You're comparing apples and oranges. Election fraud is a real thing, it is factual. And I'm not talking about the fraud allegations in the 2020 US election (that's a different matter), I'm talking about election fraud in general.

If I type "vowels are evil" into a search-engine: I don't know what search-suggestions I'd get, but I doubt it'd be "vowels are evil & yesterday killed my cat". But if I type "election fr" into a search-engine, and get no search-suggestions at all. Or get only a few, and none of them are "election fraud". Well, I find that rather odd.

Ayespy

@Eggcorn said in Any Search Engine that doesn't censored "Election fraud" suggestion search term?:

Election fraud is a real thing, it is factual.

Yeah, actually, in modern democracies, no. It's not. Not on any scale. For instance, in the US, there have been two county-wide (county, not country) cases of vote harvesting (going around collecting blank absentee ballots from people who requested them and then filling them out and turning them in instead of the actual voters) in the last 50 years. One case did not affect the final election results and, since the other might have, a new election was held - without the candidate who had paid for the vote harvesting. Both cases resulted in felony convictions and prison time. On the other hand, individual people who tried to vote twice, tried to help a single ineligible voter to vote (whose vote was not permitted) or tried to vote themselves while not eligible (which vote was not counted) are serving prison terms of up to five years apeice.

Wide-scale systemic election fraud within the systems of Europe, the US, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Scandinavia, is a hallucination. A fever dream. Autocracies, on the other hand, hold sham elections all the time. That is, indeed, election fraud. There are reams and reams of data on such "elections," which one can use a search engine to help themselves find. Likewise, there have been situations like the 1948 parliamentary election in Italy, which was HEAVILY manipulated by multiple outside forces, though there does not appear to be much of a record of actual vote fraud - just money, organizing efforts and propaganda from international interlopers. But that's history.

Then you have things like ballot box stuffing, as mentioned here: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_stuffing , a low-tech and clumsy tactic which in modern democracies always gets caught and punished - but which in less-advanced democracies or autocracies is frequently handsomely rewarded, since these do not have systems to prevent fake votes.

sjudenim

@Ayespy

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

The US is different than every other country you mentioned too since it allows each state to regulate federal elections, opening the door to different election laws for the same election. Not good

and more to the thread topic
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-06-22/google-is-the-worlds-biggest-censor-and-its-power-must-be-regulated

Sadly, even DuckDuck is not free of this.

I tried typing "Election F" and was getting suggestions, but not any for fraud. I added the "r" and all suggestions stopped. I typed out the entire word without any suggestions

Eggcorn

@Ayespy You're missing the point of my last post, this is not about if the 2020 US election was fraudulent or not! And another mod's already said that this thread is not the place to debate that (unless I've misunderstood her).

The point is: Election fraud is a thing that exists. And it's a very notable topic (even putting aside the 2020 allegations). It's certainly not "How do i inject peanut butter intravenously to make me immune to alien kidnap?". So you'd think that typing "election fr" into a search-engine would show "election fraud" as a search-suggestion.