Heart Of Gold 💛 🚀 🐋 🌺

[npro]

@potmeklecbohdan said in Heart Of Gold :

(nyxt is my next favourite).

Though it says it supports extensions written in Common Lisp , not lua, wouldn't that be a problem to you?

They are there just when I need to follow a link / click a button etc with the keyboard. Thanks to them I can do so by simply looking at the relevant element’s number & writing it.

yep quite handy for those that use the keyboard explicitly.

[A Former User]

@npro said in Heart Of Gold :

Though it says it supports extensions written in Common Lisp , not lua, wouldn't that be a problem to you?

It’s true that lua is probably easier to learn, but it’s fairly weird as well (especially if I want to write 5.1-, hence JIT-, -compatible code). So I don’t think adding lisp to the list of languages I kinda know would be too hard. (& there’s something cool about its syntax, though I can’t remember what… could it be the parentheses?)

yep quite handy for those that use the keyboard explicitly.

(Which I still haven’t fully learned, but it’s much better already. I only miss vim-like interaction with text fields, as moving my hand to arrows is too much work.)

[Ornorm]

@guigirl said in Vivaldi 3.8 RC 1 – Vivaldi Desktop Browser snapshot 2259.25/27:

mighty ancient Greek god Yooop

I'm really sorry but, once again, I'm lost and confused by the elusive vocabulary you're frequently using on this forum. I make a lot of efforts, I sometimes need to read your posts many times to understand the profound meaning of your messages but... again I'm sorry, it goes way too far.
Bizarre numbers/equations, abbreviations, slang language, Strayan's incomprehensible wordings, lots of references to ancient works that were probably famous or interesting for a bunch of geeky-elitist intellectuals... Too much for me. Too difficult. I'm tired of it.
Did you forget English isn't my mother tongue?

@Ornorm said in Vivaldi 3.8 RC 1 – Vivaldi Desktop Browser snapshot 2259.25/27:
Yooop!

Did I gotcha? Just a little bit?
If so, I'm truly (really) sorry.

[Ornorm]

@guigirl said in Heart Of Gold :

I will back off

Based on the last posts and discussions you've had with outsiders, I can say I'm afraid it comes true...

[Stardust]

@Ornorm said in Heart Of Gold :

Bizarre numbers/equations, abbreviations, slang language, Strayan's incomprehensible wordings, lots of references to ancient works that were probably famous or interesting for a bunch of geeky-elitist intellectuals...

:smiling_face_with_open_mouth_closed_eyes: :smiling_face_with_open_mouth_closed_eyes:

[Ornorm]

@guigirl Nope, just giving love!
Certainly because of ...

@Ornorm said in Heart Of Gold :

I'm afraid it comes true...

[Ornorm]

@guigirl Wow! Sorry about the worries.
It was weird. Really weird.
Did you also see that Nope, just giving love! message? What was that?
I did find fingers moving on my keyboard and on my mouse frantically like a spider on its web wrapping its prey.
But it went away now. It should all be back to normal now.

So, I saw a mix of (beware, horror show!) :

this
with that

[Ornorm]

@guigirl said in Bookmarks should be saved to the bottom of the folder's list, now it's upside down:

Great, finally a browser designed for the antipodes. Down here, we've waited for so long...

[nomadic]

@Ornorm said in Heart Of Gold :

Try with https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/53763/heart-of-gold/9999
You can add a Task as a reminder to update that number to 99999 later because I suppose this thread will last long

Over 2000 posts in less than half a year, might need to set an earlier date for that reminder to increase that number...

[Ornorm]

@nomadic Woooooow... you're right.

We're really exaggerating here.
But, a heart of gold is the best gold min(e)d.
(ooooh, soooo cute... )

[A Former User]

@guigirl I’ve already been using s6 for some months…

[hlehyaric]

Here:

it's about 1 - 1.5 seconds. That's a lot of time.

[Ayespy]

@hlehyaric Here, it's .75 sec which, apparently, is also "a lot of time." It's faster than normal human perception/reaction time, but it's "a lot of time." OK.

[Stardust]

In a browser world everything that > 0.1 sec is slow
PS: I didn't read that thread

[Ayespy]

@Stardust The action that's being reported is the creation of a new window by dragging a tab.

[Stardust]

@Ayespy

It's pretty fast for me. Maybe it's slow on the old hardware...

[Ayespy]

@Stardust Compared to Edge or Chrome, which create the new window as you are beginning the drag, instantaneously, any time elapsed at all would be called "slow" by gamers and others who have to have every action taken against any control generate a result with literally zero time elapsed. Vivaldi could do it too, if only it didn't have its own non-native UI.

[Stardust]

@Ayespy I see. In Firefox it's also fast.

[Pathduck]

@Ayespy @Stardust You are clearly intentionally derailing this thread with a technical discussion that does not contain any references to either:

• HHGTTG
• Monty Python
• Popular/trash culture in general
• The trials (and occasional tribulations) of using an obscure, elitist Linux-distro.
• Random attempts at "cryptography"
• Numerology - specifically the number 42 and its derivations
• Australian politics and (lack of) culture
• Inane banter

I shall have this matter reported as OT forthwith for the harshest penalties possible

[Stardust]

@Pathduck but I was trying to be as OT as possible
I like the #4 topic btw