specific media-source videos don't stream, but instead download then play; causes long browsing delays.
-
@hlehyaric said in *specific* feed channel embedded videos don't play:
Forget it
too late, i already "forgot" it.
-
@ybjrepnfr If one can't peacefully edit their own posts…
-
Well, regarding "the problem" -
I added the feed from Tilvid Blogs
There was a video in "TILvids Update - January 2022" and this played OK for me (from the feed). No spooling/buffering needed.
-
@TbGbe
flagged for off-topic. no, wait...oh, ok, thank you. not sure now at all what's going on.
-
@ybjrepnfr What are those people who stay on topic? What a shame! Disgraceful!
-
@hlehyaric Sorry, I'm not a friend, I'm a very naughty boy!
-
@TbGbe said in *specific* feed channel embedded videos don't play:
I'm a very naughty boy!
Yes, you are as every knows!
-
@hlehyaric sigh, bitten by the 10 limit again.
-
@TbGbe said in *specific* feed channel embedded videos don't play:
very naughty boy
first offence, prolly get away with...
-
@ybjrepnfr Just as well! You shouldn't upvote that!!
-
@ybjrepnfr I also hit the ten limit wall…
Time to move over… -
@TbGbe said in *specific* feed channel embedded videos don't play:
Well, regarding "the problem" -
I added the feed from Tilvid Blogs
There was a video in "TILvids Update - January 2022" and this played OK for me (from the feed). No spooling/buffering needed.
There you go, OT territory. I warned y’all she is a bad influence. Can’t trust a smiley. Just likes to watch it all burn
-
@luetage willis, reprised... again.
-
@ybjrepnfr said in *specific* feed channel embedded videos don't play:
problem feed: https://tilvids.com/feeds/videos.xml?accountId=252
oh goodness -- after several minutes, this feed's video suddenly began playing! tried it again, and yes, after another interminable delay, it stops spooling and begins playing. now i don't know what to conclude.
same. Could be a new bug. I tried it also with odysee, some older entries need a couple of seconds there too, but not minutes.
-
@npro now i must, really i'm compelled, to express my great shock at finding someone else here who actually engaged with the question. what are you, some kind of troublemaker or something?
thanks much for testing it for me. dunno about you, but i'm just confused about this problem... or at least, it's reproducible by you & me, whereas not @TbGbe for whom it seems to be ok. aaaaaaand, no other channel, nor individual feed therein, misbehaves like this for me. by which i mean; if it really is a vivaldi bug, it's a pretty weird forensically targeted one!
-
@ybjrepnfr I too am having similar problems. Basically I find the phone's interface of WhatsApp a bit difficult to manage, especially when posting my comment from a nano onscreen keyboard. I have been using Web.Whatsapp instead on the desktop. Lately when a link to a feed is received often the response of Vivaldi is thumbnail of a "dead crow" lying on its back. Edge can handle that but it is a bigger PITA in many other respects. So Now I am experimenting with Comodo Dragon for the past 2 - 3 days. So far so good.
Don't like Chrome because it leaves 17 processes running in background blocking 2GB of memory + spying on mu other activities same as Edge. Can't and won't use FireFox under any circumstances. Hope the designers sort it out. Both are based on Chromium so why this anomaly?
-
yesterday, that same channel, a video took [i think something like] ten bleedin' minutes before it began actually streaming. my goodness! meanwhile, ALL other feeds for ALL other channels, continue to behave very nicely in vivaldi.
-
today https://tilvids.com/w/uDAf115m942nCza4TWWJHC took "only" 1 minute to begin streaming in vivaldi's feeds tab, so that's quite brief, historically. all other channels' feeds continue to be instant, so something clearly is still wrong.
6.1.3001.3
-
today's episode took five minutes before beginning to play. far freakin' out!
-
slightly o/t, but also still kinda sorta semi-relevant. ish.
Spoiler
as a long-held personal preference, i've tended to a browser-only approach for my rss feeds, eg, vivaldi feeds,
feedbro
extension in vivaldi, orfeedbro
add-on in firefox. today i decided to re-examine that preference, so spent a few hours testing a few dedicated foss rss/feeds gui apps. the one i'm talking about hereafter, isrss guard
.
i exported my feeds from ff nightly, coz i could not remember / deduce how to export them from vivaldi, imported them intorss guard
, updated them, then began testing the app's performance. overall it was quite reasonable, better even than i might have expected, with these two notable exceptions:
- being unable to runublock origin
in this app, i was horrified to unavoidably get ads in youtube; aaaaarrrrrggghhh; that's a showstopper for me.
- it's not possible to havepicture-in-picture
for any of the streaming videos therein; that's a showstopper for me.anyway, one of the channels whose feeds i tested in the app, was the one for which i created this thread. to my "amusement", these tilvids videos suffer the identical looooooooong delay as in vivaldi... despite still being fine in
feedbro
. so, what does this mean? implicitly, the problem is upstream of vivaldi, not vivaldi per se... yet how can that be correct iffeedbro
manages them perfectly?Spoiler