A little catch up – Vivaldi Browser snapshot 2839.3
-
@Vort
Hi, I can open a private window 10 times in a row without errors.
May you open a new thread for this issue, these reports in a snapshot thread goes often lost.Cheers, mib
-
@Pesala Maybe I wrote it many months ago, don't remember. Looking on settings window, 7/9 of all settings are checkboxes/radiobuttons. Yes/no, true/false, 0/1, whatever style programmer would choice. To save bytes, lets use 0/1. One textfile where one line corresponding to every checkbox/radiobutton in settings could look like:
settings.ini: # section startup checkOnStartup=1 startPage=1 specificPage=0 txtSpecificPage="" ... #section tabs showTabBar=1 startpage=1 homePage=0 ...
And so on...If the radiobuttons are groupped, which I normally would do, probably no need to specify every radio button.
Then write simple parser function which will check if only 0/1 are used for specific variables. No rocket science.
I made .txt file with 3500 lines. It takes 140KB. If I count with two and a half million of users, it takes 333GB. That is nothing. I doubt that sync servers are running under someone's table at home.
However, if I compress the file with bzip2, it has 140 bytes! So that is 0.32GB size of "full" settings of 2 500 000 users. That is even more nothing. Compressing/decompressing text file is instant, so it can be done on client side. And it is already done like that with current sync.
As far as I know, business internet's pays for up/down speed, not for transferred data.
So in real, I don't see any obstacles to not implement "full" settings sync.
And if the team needs rapidly more space to store simple values, then something is wrong with the design of settings. It doesn't make sense that from section TABS 4 random checkboxes are synced and the rest are ignored.
-
@mib2berlin said in A little catch up – Vivaldi Browser snapshot 2839.3:
Hi, I can open a private window 10 times in a row without errors.
I don't know reproduction conditions for this problem.
Most likely, it happens because my PC have constant CPU, RAM and network load and browser is not tested by developers under such conditions.@mib2berlin said in A little catch up – Vivaldi Browser snapshot 2839.3:
May you open a new thread for this issue, these reports in a snapshot thread goes often lost.
It makes sense only if someone guess what happens and find more clues. Thank you for response anyway.
-
@Vort
Hi, I compile an application, all CPU threads 100%, and download a 5 GB iso file.
My system starts swapping on the disk (SSD) and the last few private windows need 20 seconds to open but they open.
The system lags badly but Linux memory management is very good so all still work.
May you check your OS task manager if the system swap too, then it can take a long time to open a window, several minutes on a HDD.Cheers, mib
-
@mib2berlin for me, private window either shows its contents relatively fast (< 5 seconds), or fails to do so completely. I did not tried to wait for too long, I just closed such window with Alt+F4 (I have no other choice, because window have no close button at this stage) and opened it again in hopes that it will work this time. When window opens normally, I hear fan speed changes and then interface shows up, but when glitch happens, fan accelerates, slows down, but grey window stays grey.
It may be related to swapping (not directly however), but also may be related to using browser for too long without restarts - looks like browser accumulates glitches over time. -
@Vort I suspect it's some kind of race condition. If one command completes in front of another, all is well. If the other one completes first, it kills or freezes the operation.
-
@Ayespy yes, most likely. And to catch such problems, tests made specifically to highlight such problems are needed.
Some examples are: 100% CPU load (easiest one) and constant RAM swapping (harder).
It is also possible to add to browser randomly lines with delay function calls. If it not break with such changes, then with real delays it will be reliable enough too. -
@enc0re I'll add that if the concern is server space, I'd welcome a partnering with a cloud service of some sort so users can at least "self-host" their own settings files... End-to-end encryption is still absolutely possible, so passwords are not unsafe... I'm sure 99+% of vivaldi users would fit into 1GB of dropbox or protondrive storage for example
-
I'm having a bunch of rendering issues with Vivaldi in Mac that started today. I'm on this version, but I don't know when I updated. I made a post here:
https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/81022/snapshot-5-6-2839-3-rendering-issues -
Since this Snapshot one of my mail accounts (pop3) doesn't receive Mails anymore. There is no error message. Not in settings nor when I check Mails. I have this problem on two computers with the same account. Thunderbird has no problems with receiving Mails from this account. Anyone else such problems or ideas to fix this problem.
-
@Popanz Which mail provider is this? May be provider blocked Vivaldi as unsafe app or OAuth si broken.
-
No, this isn't the reason. It is an Ionos account. Most of my accounts are hosted by Ionos.
And I now tried on one of my computers to delete the account and set it up again. Now it downloads my mails again. But I have the problem, that my old mails are now not shown anymore. Even so the mails are still in the folder which belongs to the account. I have tried to delete the File Mail.db as well. That didn't help. -
-
@DoctorG
Thanx for your help. I could solve my problems. Even so there are some ungood feelings remaining.
See here: https://forum.vivaldi.net/post/624672 -
@Popanz I do not test Vivaldi Mail, can not help more.
-
-
@Gif2D You mean Heinz Ketch-Up?
-
Can you guys please do something about the address bar aggressively auto-completing? At least provide an update as to where you're at on this issue...
-
Two weeks without a snapshot but tomorrow's friday.
-
14 days ago*