Improving your favorite web browser.

  • Vivaldi Team

    Hi y'all, If you could add a feature, or improve an existing one, in your favorite web browser, what would that added feature be, or what would you like to see improved and why?

  • In my "favorite" browser I would like to see side panel (again). Favorite is actually O12, but as it is become hard to surf on heavy JS sites, I'm last month or two, full time on Opera NEXT (since bookmarks bar doesn't close folder menu on middle click :woohoo: :woohoo: … that was really annoying)
    So, I would like to see side panel in O-Blink with cool tools like notes, bookmarks ...
    and mouse gesture for zooming (all mouse-zooming extensions are triggering context menu or even new tab)

  • Opera Presto in 11.64 stadium was actually complete. Maybe in a more modern look? Of course with an engine, that will be more fault-tolerant, like IE or FF (Presto is/was a bit picky and many sites don´t care about W3C standards) and also can handle the mentioned endless and heavy JS sites like Facebook & Co. better. I don´t use them - however, if a browser nowadays should be successful, then this is a fundamental requirement.

    What I really would like to see is a video detection and download function for any video content on each page. That means, the browser detects embedded videos and can download them directly (e.g. as MP4). That would be awesome! 😉

  • Vivaldi Team

    For me the lack on a built in e-mail client is crucial. I used M2 in Opera for years and have not found an alternative I like yet. I am a web mail refugee until a better e-mail client comes along, preferably built into a web browser I can call my favorite. Not much indicates it will happen though. I like having e-mail and the web in one interface since they are very much related and fit well together.

  • Moderator

    For me the PageDown/PageUp behaviour needs to be fixed before I will upgrade.

    In Opera 11.64 or earlier, the page scrolled by the full height of the view port when using the PageDown or PageUp keys so that the last line before became the first line after, or vice versa.

    Since Opera 12 this behaviour was intentionally changed to fix problems on FaceBook, Twitter, and other such sites, which have a floating banner occupying part of the web page.

    Fix these broken sites with browser js, but don't break every other site on the Internet just to make these sites look good.

  • Improving my favorite browser (err… internet suite!)?
    I would add s/mime to M2 and/or a GnuPG API


    Maybe in a more modern look?

    Build a "modern" skin, edit all dialogs, all menus, rearrange all buttons and you are there. All possible with O<15
    I can remember the mod of Moose who removed every visible part of the UI and put everything into custom mouse gestures, keyboard shortcuts and right-click menus. Not even the first Google Chrome went that far 😃
    BTW: I deliberately use an "old" skin with a bit more color than the "new" skins have - not necessarily everyone likes OSX dark gray on light gray - and a ton of buttons and massively edited menus. Tastes vary …

  • My setup is still strongly based on the one developed by Moose in the mid 2000s. It's not free of visible GUI because a variety of switches are included as indicators. And the menubar actually includes far more, not less functionality ordered in a more logical manner.

    What is true is that e.g. the tabbar and menubar are meant to be toggled. There's often little reason to have them active.

  • @christian:

    For me the lack on a built in e-mail client is crucial.

    Same here. After moving from Opera 12 (I'm on Ubuntu Linux) to Firefox, I found an extension called SimpleMail that does pretty much the same job as the email client in Opera.

  • My favourite Browser is Opera 12.16 and the only thing that can be better is to reintegrate Unite and do a better version of the IRC client and also a direct editing of the html in e-mail composer (now i can only add code but not edit it).

  • OK, in my first post in this thread i didn't write how to improve a browser:

    Some geeky things, one that came to my mind when I was playing around with Qupzilla (or some other Chromium derivative, don't remember exactly so please don't sue me if it was not Qupzilla):
    Cutting down the referrer to the domain part. No need to know for other sites where exactly I was before. May be even better: Just send it its own address. Some sites don't like it if you deactivate the referrer completely, may be that would help.

    A real good content blocker. I was playing around a little bit with the Lightbeam extension for Firefox (former Collusion) and got:
    "data gathered since Jan 17, 2014 – you have visited 6 sites -- you have connected with 92 third party sites"
    (yeah - my router log said the same)
    While the urlfilter.ini in Opera <15 is really good because it does not even fire a single request to the sites that are blocked and collapses the area with the blocked content if possible, the rule generation lacks a bit. I'd like to have a learning filter. I throw stuff at it and it tries to find the smallest common denominator that doesn't break everything - may be some Bayesian based learning - but with an undo: "OMG! This broke something too much, please make the rule a little bit less generic" ...
    I personally don't care that much about the undo because I tinkered with inis almost since they started to exist, but it might be a real benefit for pure point and click users ...
    While we are at blocking: Just a simple "block all 3rd party iframes or objects" button would be welcome too.

    The 3rd thing:
    some "Make this page readable" - aka: don't give me pure black backgrounds and pure white text on it, I want my default colors which are (insert here). Furthermore the minuímum font size might look nice but it is too small for me, give me at least (insert here)px and please do some line height calculation.

    (I could provide a nice formula which calculates the line height based on used font size and line width. Works really well and helps the eye to find the next line. Wider lines need some more distance as do bigger font sizes.)
    I just scribbled something in JS, I am sure it could be done in a better way:

    function calculateLineHeight(element) {
    	var style = window.getComputedStyle(element, null).getPropertyValue('font-size');
    	var fontSize = parseFloat(style); // yes, it indeed can be float - parseInt should do too.
    	var PHI = (1 + Math.sqrt(5)) / 2;
    	var PHI1 = PHI - (1 / (2 * PHI));
    	var PHI2 = 2 * PHI * PHI * PHI;
    	var lineHeight = (element.offsetWidth / (fontSize * fontSize * PHI2)) + PHI1;
    	lineHeight = (lineHeight > 1.3) ? lineHeight : 1.3; = lineHeight;

  • Tabstaking for blink versions if possible would save alot of space on the tab bar.

  • in my favourite browser (opera 12) i would like to see something similar to chrome's IE Tab Multi extension. it allows you to open a tab as ie within chrome. more info can be found at if you can forgive the horrible english, the extension is extremely handy. I would want something like that to emulate other browser as well. it seems much better than user agent switching.

  • One Browser = One Process!

    I often mentioned it at other places but here again: The Browser must work in one process! Especially Windows can´t handle an infinite number of processes without lagging on smaller or older machines (≤ 2GB). But Opium forces it to.
    Today after a long time I tried Firefox (26.0) on my 1 GB Win7 Netbook; Man - there are worlds between in terms of speed in opposed to Opium! Firefox runs in contrast to Opium which just think two times before it opens a new tab (-process). And that only up to a certain/small number of tabs to become finally unusable. And I do not use many extensions.

    Damn. If even a different rendering engine, they should have taken that!

  • unfortunately, Firefox is also switching to multi-process architecture

  • A modern multi-core processor can handle twice as many threads as it has cores without even switching, so I wouldn't exclude multithreading completely. But … it has to recognize the resources available and handle them appropriately.

    That's one thing about Presto (and I've mentioned it elsewhere) - a seriously taxing page won't freeze it. I've seen some file listings (that is to say, no javascript at all) freeze Opera 19 for several minutes, the same page loads faster in Presto and appears less of a demand on the system.

    Say, something like (a list of files in the new version of Mageia Linux). Okay, on my Win7 laptop neither freezes, but Presto renders the page quicker and actually allows you to scroll while it is loading. You can scroll in Opera 19 too, but at some point you run out of rendered content and see just a checkerboard. But this laptop is > 1 GB RAM, it may well freeze a system with less RAM.

  • @Vux777:

    unfortunately, Firefox is also switching to multi-process architecture

    Great news … :S

    But why? What is the benefit? Or is it easier to program, therefore less work for the developers?

    Ok - in Unix (OS X and Linux) processes are only forks, so it doesn´t matter. But not in Windows. There they cause overhead, in opposite to threads within a process, which are no problem.

  • I also consider that Opera Presto was complete. The best feature would be to polish the feature sets that Opera had at versions 8-10 and make it perfectly stable, to immortalise the legend. Not going to happen, I know.

    My new favourite browser is Elinks. It is console-based, but it has menus, configurable keyboard shortcuts, bookmarks (!) and it can be extended with scripts. I'm posting in it right now. It doesn't support images directly, it doesn't have Javascript (can be added) and its support for text features is only as good as the terminal under it. I actually like it this way, because this way all text has the same size and is therefore readable. In old Opera I also used to switch images off and set a custom CSS to fix all text at certain size.

    I call it webpage optimiser. I wish more browsers would have such capacities.

  • This is probably my #1 feature I missed when switching back to Firefox. Presto performed terribly on my PC and that finally got to me.

    Otter seems promising at the moment, but still too buggy to use as a full time browser.

  • @ersi:

    My new favourite browser is Elinks. It is console-based, but it has menus, configurable keyboard shortcuts, bookmarks (!) and it can be extended with scripts…

    …and it is anyway a nerd browser. For normal users completely irrelevant and unusable.

  • @Ice007:


    My new favourite browser is Elinks. It is console-based, but it has menus, configurable keyboard shortcuts, bookmarks (!) and it can be extended with scripts…

    …and it is anyway a nerd browser. For normal users completely irrelevant and unusable.

    That's what the company decided about Opera too, you know: Irrelevant nerd browser, let's remove all features citing a bogus research according to which nobody uses bookmarks.

    Console is perfectly usable to many people I know. When you are on *nix, you have to like console, or at least tolerate it. It's good for your eyes too, when properly configured. Console-based browsers remove the unnecessary flashiness from the web. I used Opera the same way.


Looks like your connection to Vivaldi Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.