Custom CSS / Userstyles support
-
In Opera you could define your own CSS file to override styles on a per-site basis, so you could adjust each site's looks to your liking. Browsing YouTube all bright instead of dark is really uncomfortable and unfamiliar to me at this point. Can we have that back please? Possibly in a way that is compatible with https://userstyles.org ? But not script-based IMHO, as that could drag down performance. I also wouldn't want to install an extension that needs access to everything just to load an additional stylesheet.
-
On a side note, maybe there's some global css file like usercontent.css in Firefox?
Using CSS3's @document block, we could set custom css per site or regexp, no need for separate css file for each website
-
Can't you just use Stylish (the extension userstyles.org was created for)?
-
Bumping this.
Both Stylish and UserCSS are very slow and wonky. Applying CSS by th browser after the webpage CSS is loaded (rather than after the whole page is loaded) is way better and more pleasant as yo don't see randomly jumping elements around because extension is still trying to do its work.
-
Sadly, integrated UserCSS has low prio as is saw in bugtracker.
We have to wait.
-
stylus is a new fork that removes all the stuff that the new owners have added.
It is faster then Stylish
-
I tried all of them - they are slow. Very slow.
-
Stylish is slow and not always working correctly.
UserCSS like in old Opera 12 would be the best we get.
-
@Hippyjake said in Custom CSS / Userstyles support:
stylus is a new fork that removes all the stuff that the new owners have added.
It is faster then Stylish
Thanks for that. I notice some of the uso regulars are contributors. Kudos on the fork.
-
@Hippyjake i throw away Stylish because of their crappy privacy policy.
Thanks for hint to the fork Stylus.
I use it now.PS: Stylus slow is with injection of UserCSS into webpages.
-
@Gwen-Dragon
Another Stylish fork is
Webstore: osprey
github: ospreyWhile Stylus UI looks like modern Stylish, osprey looks square & dark theme.
Just my 2 cents.
I doubt either stylus or osprey have any significant difference with stylish. The forking still new.
They still bug to bug compare able. Outside scrapping telemetry part.
-
I use Custom Style Script which is very simple, has only the basic functionality and thus it's pretty lightweight and uses much fewer resources than Stylish for example. It allows CSS & JS code injection. I don't know, however, if the problem with slow code injection isn't caused by other factors like the system performance, other extensions slowing down the browser, the connection speed etc.
-
Just keep an eye on Stylus
-
@Hippyjake Too late, dear. Was already mentioned by you last day.
-
@Hippyjake said in Custom CSS / Userstyles support:
Just keep an eye on Stylus
Not much different from the rest. Every time you reload css-loaded (moderate or heavy) page with custom CSS all elements jump around. This wasn't the case with classic Opera, for example, back then,
-
@Kein said in Custom CSS / Userstyles support:
@Hippyjake said in Custom CSS / Userstyles support:
Just keep an eye on Stylus
Not much different from the rest. Every time you reload css-loaded (moderate or heavy) page with custom CSS all elements jump around. This wasn't the case with classic Opera, for example, back then,
Could you provide a page as an example as well as the custom CSS?
-
@Hippyjake It is slow, on some sites you can see a few 10th of a second the old style and then the change to the new one.
Opera 12 changed it really faster.I agree that a internal UserCSS implementation is needed.
