Some performance tests
-
I did some tests on Vivaldi's performances, to see. These are results on my laptop only (Win10 x64 - i5-5200U 2.2.Ghz - Ram 8 Gb - GTX 950M) without testing Edge, opera 31 (chropera) and others. It is not to be taken as a true comparative test . I wish to congratulate Vivaldi team for the results [b]already[/b] achieved [table] [tr] [td][/td][td]html5test /555[/td][td]octane [/td][td]kraken (less is better)[/td][td]jetstream[/td][td]peacekeeper[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]vivaldi 1.0.375.3[/td][td]521[/td][td]24944[/td][td]1401[/td][td]139,36[/td][td]3325[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Chrome 47.0.2526[/td][td]521[/td][td]24969[/td][td]1431[/td][td]133,44[/td][td]3803[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]firefox 43.0.4[/td][td]468[/td][td]23581[/td][td]1533[/td][td]130,13[/td][td]3900[/td] [/tr] [/table] No surprise with the blink rendering engine, Vivaldi and Chrome are at top and very close and firefox just a little behind. However, there is a small delay on peacekeeper test. [table] [tr] [td][/td][td]1 tab (MB)[/td][td]6 tabs (MB)[/td][td]12 tabs (MB)[/td][td]Close and reopen (with the 12 tabs)[/td][td]Reactivate each 12 Tabs[/td][td]Close all tabs except 1 tab[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]vivaldi 1.0.375.3[/td][td]192,74[/td][td]561,96[/td][td]883,04[/td][td]198,18[/td][td]830,74[/td][td]204,59[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Chrome 47.0.2526[/td][td]233,67[/td][td]612,31[/td][td]936,83[/td][td]785,52[/td][td]978,41[/td][td]246,73[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]firefox 43.0.4[/td][td]154,83[/td][td]307,95[/td][td]400,3[/td][td]155,39[/td][td]480,13[/td][td]260,63[/td] [/tr] [/table] Also expected, Firefox with Gecko uses less RAM than blink browsers. But note, that here, Vivaldi is already a little better than Chrome . However, I hope that the Ram consumption will be even better in future. Frustrated to have (chrome is my default browser, [i]currently[/i]), from time to time, a warning "remains 10% of memory" on a fairly new computer
-