Guide | 🎲 Vivaldi Search Engines Collection 🎲
-
-
@Zalex108 , hahaha, yes, I like Groot and the SSuite, but they are only 2 brothers whích develope it with their own money. Quite impressive what they have developed despite this.
https://www.ssuitesoft.com/resources/windowswithnojava.htm
I think they'd fit right into the Vivaldi Team. -
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
@Zalex108 , hahaha, yes, I like Groot and the SSuite, but they are only 2 brothers whích develope it with their own money. Quite impressive what they have developed despite this.
https://www.ssuitesoft.com/resources/windowswithnojava.htm
I think they'd fit right into the Vivaldi Team.Just tested and despite allows to add it as SE from RC, it puts the keyword on the AddressBar but just shows up the previous searched item.
Are you referring to this with:
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
Groot search, the only one you can't add to the Vivaldi search engines it works only from it's own online desktop
?
-
@Zalex108 , yes, Groot is still uns mature. Probably more adelane will work better. For the moment I use Whoogle.
-
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
@Zalex108 , yes, Groot is still uns mature. Probably more adelane will work better. For the moment I use Whoogle.
The site is nice, it's opened here to check it.
About, Whoogle, saw yesterday and forgot, will check it.
-
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
Whoogle
I would need to understand how it works being is locally installed as I've could see.
will needed.
Was "easy" to do it¿?
-
I add it simply with
https://whooglesearch.net/search?q=%s
Works fine and fast.
-
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
I add it simply with
https://whooglesearch.net/search?q=%s
Works fine and fast.
Oh!
I was on https://whoogle.sdf.org
Ok!
Thanks
-
@Zalex108 , also works with this instance. Whoogle is FOSS, with public instances or selfhosted, if you have an own server, similar to SearX, but only with the G engine, like Startpage, but faster (Startpage has ads and is proprietary, Whoogle no)
https://github.com/benbusby/whoogle-search#public-instances -
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
@Zalex108 , also works with this instance. Whoogle is FOSS, with public instances or selfhosted, if you have an own server, similar to SearX, but only with the G engine, like Startpage, but faster (Startpage has ads and is proprietary, Whoogle no)
Not worked here, and since Git explaining on how to install it, just though it's just locally.
Maybe something breaks the functionality here, a Flag or something else.
--
-
@Zalex108 , maybe, the public instance Whooglesearch is the one named in the ifficial homepage and the most stable aparntly.
-
-
@Zalex108 , My list also is full, apart of Whoogle, I use Blacklight, it analyses the pages, which tracking methodes use.
-
@Catweazle said in Guide | Vivaldi search engines collection :
@Zalex108 , My list also is full, apart of Whoogle, I use Blacklight, it analyses the pages, which tracking methodes use.
Added it yesterday xD
Tested one Site but nothing were found.
Not tested more to see how it works. -
@Zalex108 , the lack is, that some sites only track registred users (Facebook), this also apears clean. Anonym analyse can't see this, but is a good orientation when we only visit this site.
https://themarkup.org/ask-the-markup/2020/10/01/i-scanned-my-favorite-social-media-site-on-blacklight-and-it-came-up-pretty-clean-whats-going-on -
Yes,
Read that on the related post,
any site with results to view it?Ok,
Somehow did the Search Engine just from The Markup so not working at all,Just revised and checked the correct one,
https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=microsoft.com¬¬
--
Thanks
-
@Zalex108 , yes, MS, I know, but not in my Windows, it is an obedient, fast and private little lamb now, after lobotomizing it.
-
Update June 16, 2021: Added "Who sampled?" search engine.
-
@stardepp Who Sampled is great
Your AMG code needs to be fixed:
https://www.allmusic.com/search/all/%s
-
@pathduck Thanks for pointing that out, I just corrected it.