Addressfield theming
-
@madiso Nobody here sought out a random site though.
-
@Hadden89 I took your advice and colored the standard siteinfo button now, because I noticed the unhovered version can become invisible on some themes on unmodified Vivaldi. By the way, somebody noticed this?
The “Manage Cookies” button should have the lighter background of the close button, but does so only in one place, because somehow the background image gradient gets messed up.
-
mmh.. same is on CGA theme.
For padlock I opted for the minimalism.
Secure | Certified Https
NOT Secure [Http|Broken Https?] (Flipped info, tnx sjudenim)
VERY unsecure (Broken Https: Invalid certs, mixed sources and so on).
-
@luetage "Color glitch" is still present in latest snapshot.
Did you report that? -
@Hadden89 No, stuff like this is most likely already reported. It's a shame, but I don't deem bugs like this worth the time reporting, since the bugtracker is closed and I cannot check whether it's a duplicate.
But go on and issue it if you'd like ^^
-
@luetage VB-65870
I still hope we'll see a "read-only-auto-mirrored-text-only-bug-tracker-report-summary" one day.
In most cases having the essential (and un-disclosed) infos will be fine; no need to something like chr. monorail (which is quite ugly to browse). But this won't probably happen. Sad
It is of course a "low priority issue" for a snapshot but bad to see on a stable (I think we are almost in stabilization) -
@Hadden89 said in Addressfield theming:
@luetage VB-65870
I had a mail about this. Confirmed but low priority - being mainly an "aesthetic" issue.
-
@Hadden89 This seems to be fixed now, on my side the button has the right background color, both hovered and normal.
-
The newest snapshot makes the addressfield unreadable in private windows, made an update to fix this. I adjusted the faded colors in the urlfragment wrapper too, to make them slightly more visible compared to the main address.
-
Deleted four fifths of this mod, because in latest snapshot Vivaldi stopped theming the addressfield and searchfield in private windows differently. No more reverting needed.
-
Awesome! I can't believe this mod went past my radar for such a long time.
I made a few changes of my own, such as theming
.SiteInfoButton.internal
as well.
-
They really need to revert that silly search icon in the URL bar. Yes, we already know we can search in the URL bar, and it takes away a unique and identifying feature of the browser.
This is how it should look, with that sweet V logo.
(I also hide the adblock icon but that's just because I use uBO instead)/* Security default padlock */ .SiteInfoButton.internal svg path, .SiteInfoButton.warning svg path{ d: path("M10.4 5c-.4-.8 0-1.8 1-2 .7 0 1.5.4 1.6 1.2a1.4 1.4 0 0 1-.2 1l-4 7c-.3.5-.7.8-1.2.8-.6 0-1-.2-1.3-.7L3.8 7.8 2.2 5c-.5-.8 0-2 1-2 .7 0 1 .2 1.4.7l1 2 1 1.4a2 2 0 0 0 1.7 1.5 2.2 2.2 0 0 0 2.3-2V6c0-.3 0-.6-.2-1z"); }
I also show the nice old (and much easier to distinguish visually) green padlock:
/* Security padlock */ .SiteInfoButton.secure, .SiteInfoButton.certified { fill: #00a100; background-color: #004400; }
I don't do anything about the red one because that's now clearly distinguishable from the green one anyway.
I also hide any EV certificate text, but very few sites use it these days. It's just a complete waste of URL bar space.
/* EV certificate hide */ .siteinfo-text { display: none; }
-
@altcode I haven’t updated this in a while, the code I use atm is a bit different. But yeah, everybody has their own preferences and I think the address field is a perfect candidate for specific modifications.
@Pathduck As far as I can recall Chromium is going to remove the site info text in future anyway; and it’s true almost no pages are using it nowadays, it’s been more prevalent some years ago.
-
@luetage Far as I can tell from a quick test now, none of the major browsers still display the EV Certificate text, Vivaldi keeps it old-sch00l I guess
-
@luetage said in Addressfield theming:
@Pathduck As far as I can recall Chromium is going to remove the site info text in future anyway; and it’s true almost no pages are using it nowadays, it’s been more prevalent some years ago.
What is wrong with enhanced verification? Apple is still using it. Is it not preferable to have a site using the enhancement?
-
@streptococcus Nothing bad, but it wasn't widely adopted at the point browsers may omit such info, and I guess EV don't imply more secureness.
-
@hadden89 Back in the day we used to run dedicated mods to only show the site info text on hover, so it’s been an issue.
-
@luetage said in Addressfield theming:
@hadden89 Back in the day we used to run dedicated mods to only show the site info text on hover, so it’s been an issue.
That would imply that you want to have a very short address field. Why?
-
@streptococcus The visibility of site info text doesn’t alter the length of the address field. It takes up existing space and introduces noise.
-
@streptococcus We made more space inside addressfield to display the URL & easier to identify the domain with just a glimpse: