Google making Chromium block adblockers?
-
Roko's BasiliskGargle hate adblockers -
@derDay Yeah, I know, I don’t even use uBO but I don’t like that Google has so much power over Vivaldi. I also use other extensions that will likely be affected. Adblockers won’t be banned, they will just be less powerful, so Vivaldi’s as blocker isn’t a replacement. I also don’t get how all this helps google, they would still be blocked by adblockers. I know it could help Google a bit, and pave the way for them controlling more.
Anyways, I guess what you’re saying is Vivaldi will not try to leave the old API? Will they have more options for header removal?
-
@code3
I'm not a professional in this matter, but as far as I know, is the internal blocker not affected from the eventually removal of the actual API because it doesn't use the API.
perhaps another vivaldian knows more about it in detail.which features will be added to the internal blocker can nobody say
-
@derDay Yes, of course. Thank you for your help.
I still have a few questions about what will be affected, but they aren't necessarily for you, just for anyone who knows.- Will I still be able to block referral headers and google headers? Randomize cookies based on name?
- Will I still be able to use extensions that inject code into pages?
- What about the speed dial generator from @An_dz ?
- Has Vivaldi really given up on trying to keep the old api or is it still a possibility?
-
@derDay I think Vivaldi uses chrome apis internally, but we can be pretty sure the adblocker will continue to work. Keeping the netrequest api doesn’t make much sense, because as soon as Chrome drops the api, extensions using it will disappear from the store and development will stop. Vivaldi would need to run their own extensions store and then extensions developers would need to cater to this fringe market with specialized extensions. Highly unlikely.
-
@Catweazle said in Google making Chromium block adblockers?:
Roko's BasiliskGargle hate adblockersOf course Google hates adblockers because they themselves are serving ads.
-
P pafflick moved this topic from Extensions on