What is the status of VB (=already reported bug/issue)?
-
@jumpsq said in What is the status of VB (=already reported bug/issue)?:
VB-65414 (Cannot open URL from Address Bar in Background tab when setting "Open Address in New Tab" to Shift+Enter)
Closed. Why do you think it should open in a new background tab? Was that ever the case in Vivaldi?
VB-68301 (Loading page and opening new tab makes page load in new tab) [also VB-74016]
Closed as duplicate of another bug that's been marked as resolved (CNR). For what it's worth, I cannot reproduce it either (on Windows)
VB-69090 (Not returning to recently used tab) [usually off-by-one]
Closed (CNR)
VB-78971 (Single Key Shortcuts activate when they should not)
Marked as duplicate of another issue that is Open (very old issue)
VB-70521 (Nicknames lost case sensitivity)
Confirmed
VB-77418 (Sent drafts are still ordered by draft creation date, not sent date)
Unconfirmed. I'll test it in a bit and confirm, if it's the case.
VB-77642 (search is not comprehensive)
It was closed as CNR but I just reopenned it again and asked for some clarity.
VB-77654 (task due date not synced [caldav])
Unconfirmed
VB-78141 (e-mails are imported to the wrong accounts, new folders are created)
Unconfirmed
feature requests (if you can talk about those)
VB-74545 (M3 missing shortcuts)Confirmed
VB-75032 (Labelling and moving drafts not possible)
Unconfirmed
VB-77156 (unable to copy multiple mail adresses from composing window)
Unconfirmed
-
Thanks. I can reproduce both
VB-68301
andVB-69090
and may post an update reply to those issues.VB-65414 (Cannot open URL from Address Bar in Background tab when setting "Open Address in New Tab" to Shift+Enter)
Closed. Why do you think it should open in a new background tab? Was that ever the case in Vivaldi?Two point five reasons:
- If
Open Address in New Tab
is set toAlt+Enter
, this works withAlt+Ctrl+Enter
, so there should be some way to make it work when usingShift+Enter
as a setting as well. - It works this way in Opera 12, so this is what I'm used to, plus I think it's the easier Shortcut when copy-pasting multiple URLs to open in background tabs.
- I do not see the point of opening new windows with
Shift+Ctrl+Enter
VB-78971 (Single Key Shortcuts activate when they should not)
Marked as duplicate of another issue that is Open (very old issue)This is interesting. Vivaldi started to trigger shortcuts when I am using etherpads and such fairly recently and fairly regularly, so tabs suddenly close or switch or the zoom level is adjusted, just because I'm typing.
Not going to discuss it in this thread any further.
- If
-
Hi, any news on VB-14668?
It has been over a year since last time I asked...
And not to be picky here, but MS Edge is working fine in that matter -
@leepa said in What is the status of VB (=already reported bug/issue)?:
Hi, any news on VB-14668?
It has been over a year since last time I asked...
And not to be picky here, but MS Edge is working fine in that matterNo progress as far I can see
@jumpsq said in What is the status of VB (=already reported bug/issue)?:
...
Not going to discuss it in this thread any further.Feel free to DM me if you wish to discuss
-
@jumpsq said in What is the status of VB (=already reported bug/issue)?:
VB-77418 (Sent drafts are still ordered by draft creation date, not sent date)
I have now confirmed this issue
VB-77642 (search is not comprehensive)
I'm told this may receive some attention in the near future
-
How about VB-79445?
-
@slownicofish VB-79445 is still Unconfirmed. (I also just did a quick test and Vivaldi behaved normally, so your steps-to-reproduce are either incomplete, very specific to your installation, or do not reproduce on mine.)
-
@xyzzy Sounds odd actually. I just reinstalled the browser and tried again and it seems to apply on the new install too. Another mod in another thread were able to reproduce:
https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/60645/white-flash-when-loading-site-from-speed-dial-if-you-go-back-to-speed-dial-and-go-the-site-again?_=1620688206475 -
@slownicofish I just confirmed VB-79445. I also added more detailed steps-to-reproduce to help the devs and QA team reproduce this consistently.
-
I would appreciate learning about the status of Bug VB-75874 (M3: Search does not find some emails)
-
@wildente VB 75874 - M3: Search does not find some emails
Whut? Was M3 public as far back as January? I guess so.
This may not actually be a bug. It is unconfirmed. Thing is, in order to find a term from the body of an email in search, the body of the email must first have been downloaded. And if you don't have prefetch enabled for the account, then no email body is downloaded until you view it. To maximize the efficacy of search, you have to be pre-fetching.
-
@ayespy said in What is the status of VB (=already reported bug/issue)?:
To maximize the efficacy of search, you have to be pre-fetching.
Prefetching is on and I look at the mail, type the search term that I see in the mail body, and it is removed from the list of emails.
Screenshots here, and I guess if we keep discussing we should do it there in order not to annoy everyone on this thread.
https://forum.vivaldi.net/topic/55081/search-not-working-properly-emails-sent-to-self-are-very-strange/10?_=1620755640572 -
hello,
status of VB-74197 ?Thank you.
-
@fofo VB-74197 has been reopened but is not currently assigned to a developer.
-
(VB-78690) [Regression][Address bar] no longer decodes
(VB-78691) [Dev Tools] Does not show window title when undocked
ā² Did they receive my reply and reproduce it?(VB-78692) [Address bar][Regression] Fail to drag-drop URL into some editor control, and VB-60071 occurs again
-
@vias The status of these bugs are as follows:
VB-78690 - Confirmed
VB-78691 - Still Resolved/Cannot Reproduce. (I cannot reproduce this either, at least not on Windows 10)
VB-78692 - Confirmed -
Hi!
What are statuses of those bugs? Thanks!
VB-48322
VB-47898
VB-47896
VB-28940 -
@sukovec
VB-48322 - Resolved / Cannot Reproduce
VB-47898 - Resolved / Cannot Reproduce
VB-47896 - Resolved / Cannot Reproduce
VB-28940 - Reopened, not currently assigned to a developer -
@xyzzy Well, I don't understand it. All those bugs were "Confirmed" year and half ago and now cannot be reproduced? At least 48322 and 47898 are not present anymore so it's OK, but 47896 is still here. It can be reproduced easily with a script I wrote and even other users are sometimes affected by this bug.
-
@sukovec If a reproducible bug gets solved and can no longer be reproduced, its status can be changed to "cannot reproduce."