{Article} Arch Linux has a "single point of failure"?
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/jxaktq/arch_linux_has_a_single_point_of_failure/
Interesting food for thought. As one commenter noted, this is but one instance amongst the multitude, of the "Bus Factor". However in these extant Zombie Apocalypse days, i [grimly] wonder if some smaller GNU / FOSS projects might founder entirely.
Fwiw:
steffie@archlinuxTower[~] 12:13:39 Fri Nov 20 $> echo "$(echo "scale=1; 100 * $(pacman -Qi $(pacman -Qq) | grep Felix | wc -l) / $(pacman -Qq | wc -l)" | bc) %" 19.1 %
-
我大概看了下,也还好,大都不是核心包。如果没有维护,对archlinux能正常运行下去影响不大。
echo "$(echo "scale=1; 100 * $(pacman -Qi $(pacman -Qq) | grep Felix | wc -l) / $(pacman -Qq | wc -l)" | bc) %" 22.4 %
pacman -Qi $(pacman -Qq) | grep -B15 Felix | grep "^Name"
-
14.4 % on my Artix.
Artix Build Bot
packages 73.5 % of what I have installed. -
15,9% here
"You should post it in the GNU/Linux section" , little they know... good work
Maybe it's a good time and reason for people to come together and focus on a max
pactree major_distro -d1 -r
instead of what it is today -
@npro said in {Article} Arch Linux has a "single point of failure"?:
focus on a max pactree major_distro -d1 -r
Or even better, Max Headroom...
-