V | UI Speed
-
@kimoo According to that, your system isn't even working hard. How could Vivaldi be slow? But if it's trying to decode nineteen videos at once, that will slow things down. We don't see what the GPU is doing there.
-
@Ayespy surfing sometimes is fine and fast , but the problem when try to close or move between tabs , the close button toke a seconds to appear and the window toke also a seconds to close , i think such thing can happened in my old P4 PC and not with this 4 Cores PC
-
@kimoo That's puzzling. Here, my A10 machine shows the close button instantaneously and tab switching is instantaneous as well. Your machine is doing something differently from mine. It is even instantaneous on my 2-core AMD 7550 if the tabs are already loaded. The only time consumed is to build a page that was hibernated when I opened it.
-
@kimoo Do you have a huge number of bookmarks, notes or both? Do you save history "forever?"
-
This post is deleted! -
@Ayespy said in i got a new PC , and all problem still same , i was expect to see V more fast , it's not:
@kimoo That's puzzling. Here, my A10 machine shows the close button instantaneously and tab switching is instantaneous as well. Your machine is doing something differently from mine. It is even instantaneous on my 2-core AMD 7550 if the tabs are already loaded. The only time consumed is to build a page that was hibernated when I opened it.
so you also have same version of my proccessor ? cause it has several versions , even have a ddr4 version , it called A10 8770 and 9700 , but main is 7800b it's ddr3 , so what's your one exactly ?? and what configer you do with your GPU , autumatic or limited it ?
-
@kimoo Mine's the 7870K, which also had the Radeon R7 built in. The GPU portion of it failed, so I had to install an NVidia GeForce GT 710, just to have some graphics.
DDR3 comes in more than one speed. Mine is running at about 800MHz. Two 8GB modules.
-
@Ayespy said in i got a new PC , and all problem still same , i was expect to see V more fast , it's not:
@kimoo Mine's the 7870K, which also had the Radeon R7 built in. The GPU portion of it failed, so I had to install an NVidia GeForce GT 710, just to have some graphics.
DDR3 comes in more than one speed. Mine is running at about 800MHz. Two 8GB modules.
please look here , my ram is 2 pieces first one in sumsung and second is Micronteck look in photos well please
Witch one is best ? and you think if i replaces there places with each other it will be better ? cause the Micron one is 800 MHz
-
@kimoo I don't think changing places would be better.
You need to have two modules that are running at the same speed, or the whole system will run at the slower speed. Again, if I were in your shoes, I would at least try to obtain two modules of the same brand and speed, 4GB per module for a total of 8GB, and each of them being DDR3-1600/PC3 -12800. (800 MHz)
At the very least, you would be better in my opinion replacing the 667MHz module with an 800MHz module, even if it's only a 2GB module. Brand is not as important as speed. You want to at least be running the same clock speed in both modules. That is strictly my opinion. I build some of my own systems, and upgrade all of my own systems, and would never run two mismatched modules in the same machine.
-
@Ayespy said in i got a new PC , and all problem still same , i was expect to see V more fast , it's not:
@kimoo I don't think changing places would be better.
You need to have two modules that are running at the same speed, or the whole system will run at the slower speed. Again, if I were in your shoes, I would at least try to obtain two modules of the same brand and speed, 4GB per module for a total of 8GB, and each of them being DDR3-1600/PC3 -12800. (800 MHz)
At the very least, you would be better in my opinion replacing the 667MHz module with an 800MHz module, even if it's only a 2GB module. Brand is not as important as speed. You want to at least be running the same clock speed in both modules. That is strictly my opinion. I build some of my own systems, and upgrade all of my own systems, and would never run two mismatched modules in the same machine.
and you think i will feel a different if i replaced my 10600 with 12800 one ?
-
@kimoo
In my opinion it is better to have 8 GB mixed then 4 GB in the end.
I never have stability problems in mixed environment but ideal is same brand, same speed.
Anyway, first you have to change to 64 bit and this need a new Windows install.
You can use your license key for both.Another point you mention was 1-2 seconds to close Vivaldi.
I have this on my 16 GB i5 and 8 GB i7, too but not every time.
If I could reproduce it I would make a bug report.
Changing tabs is always fast for me.Cheers, mib
-
@kimoo It's hard for me to say what difference you would see, but you would almost have to notice a difference.
-
Hi,
Backup your Data and upgrade to x64.
Use the other Partition to move the User Folders before.
If doesn't exist, create it from Windows or use any Partition Manager.
MiniTool free should be enough.+/- 70Gb for System without User Folders should be enough.
-
kimoo, did you try other browsers, are they good in tab switching?
Did you try clean profile (default settings) in V?
Maybe you should try to disable hardware acceleration in V settings, or update video drivers, just in case.
And what disk in your PC? If old HDD, then maybe change it to SSD. -
I have used chromium,firefox,palemoon on my measly 32bit 2gb ram laptop and i can say vivaldi beats the ass off of all of them...the speed of rendering is insane and my machine is not that powerful.
i am on linux btw.
-
@Priest72 You are supposed to say: ”I'm on arch btw”…
-
@luetage i dare not use arch lol
-
@mib2berlin said in i got a new PC , and all problem still same , i was expect to see V more fast , it's not:
@kimoo
In my opinion it is better to have 8 GB mixed then 4 GB in the end.
I never have stability problems in mixed environment but ideal is same brand, same speed.
Anyway, first you have to change to 64 bit and this need a new Windows install.
You can use your license key for both.Another point you mention was 1-2 seconds to close Vivaldi.
I have this on my 16 GB i5 and 8 GB i7, too but not every time.
If I could reproduce it I would make a bug report.
Changing tabs is always fast for me.Cheers, mib
first what mean mixed ? you mean mixed brands or mixed speed ?
Another point you mention was 1-2 seconds to close Vivaldi.
I have this on my 16 GB i5 and 8 GB i7, too but not every time.
If I could reproduce it I would make a bug report.
Changing tabs is always fast for me.Cheers, mib
Same with me , the close button "X" toke a time to appear if you was opened several tabs and in that time it was seems that the browser freeze in those 1 or 2 second
modedit repaired quote
-
@Ayespy said in i got a new PC , and all problem still same , i was expect to see V more fast , it's not:
@kimoo It's hard for me to say what difference you would see, but you would almost have to notice a difference.
i changed there places with each other , i put the fast one in socket number 1 , and now i feel it's only a " little " better
may be i'm wrong , -
surfing some big pages with photos , sometimes photos not appear , for example this page
https://www.ubuy.com.eg/ar/electronics/accessories/routers/id-300189/category-list-view/go down and down and then the photo won't appear
it happened also " sometimes " with facebook ,
this problem happened with latest versions of Vivaldi and not happened with old 2018 versions
it seems for me that i need to back to old 2018 versions again
it was works so well , open all videos and had no problem , even with my old Pentium 4 PC