@Team_Vivaldi: We changed the structure of features requests and will make a topic for each release (1.4 then 1.5 then 1.6 etc) that way it's easier for everyone to follow it up. For that reason we're closing this thread. Please visit the appropriate topic to submit your new request. Thank you for your understanding and sharing your great ideas. We appreciate them greatly. It was the great Idea, that way you see what is priority on each moment too

Thank you Christoph and I'm sorry to reply late. I missed your advice. Overlay scrollbars in flags is almost perfect except: –--------------- 1. Find markers in the scrollbar area don't work 2. Facebook submenus don't work (likely the same problem would affect other websites like it) Modern scroll is very nice too but: 1. Find markers in the scrollbar area don't work 2. Panel scrollbar doesn't change The Find markers do work with the scrollbar on the Dakotafire website. How are they doing them? So I guess I am left hoping for Vivaldi to tweak the scrollbars eventually.

I'm sure that once you guys get the more ambitious features in place and begin to hone in on fine tuning, you'll add small but important details that enhance the UX. One such detail is animation in all appropriate places, and one such place is that toggling extension visibility should animate when your search bar or address bar extends or contracts. (Of course, you can go to other extreme like Opera Neon, where the UI elements all feel like they're sitting on jelly. Way too much.)

I haven't experienced any crashing. So far, the only thing I've noticed is that it may hold up for a bit when you click on a link or want a page to load when the internet connection lowers a bit. Chrome will still load pretty fast under that same condition. It's not so much of a complaint, more of a speaking out of one final attribute that would let Vivaldi shoot Chrome out of the water… Of course, the second Vivaldi becomes like Google or Microsoft and is no longer secure in terms of privacy, you won't be a growing popularity anymore despite how "pretty" this browser looks.

@Cqoicebordel: Two things. First, indeed, it's really complicated to build a browser. Sure, a one-guy team could build something, look at Otter. But here, they are building something that will be feature packed, and they are building for the future. It takes more time. I'm also saying that they are a small team compared to other browsers'. As for "adding the drag to create a new window is usually one of the first things to be created on a browser", that's only your point of view. For me, what is and should be implemented as soon as possible when you build a browser, is putting the tabbar at the bottom. And after years and years, Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari… still can't do it. Vivaldi is built to have lots of feature. But for each feature, you have to take time. That's really easy for other browsers as they remove features instead of adding some. In conclusion, drag and drop of tabs will come (and sooner than later). Bitching about it isn't helping. nobody is bitching about anything. and seriously tab bar at the bottom as priority? do you use druggs or something? what are the advantages about that? because i've been trying that and I can tell the only difference I noticed is that it takes a longer path for my mouse to reach there… besides, if the devs start putting dead features or almost dead features (like support for flash, silverlight, etc) or putting stupid features that are not usefull, the browser will become bloated > become shitty> people won't use it. but wait... vivaldi indeed supports flash and other problematic plugins... while other browsers are taking support for flash for example since 2014/15, vivaldi added those features, damn, I feel a lot safer now, such a useful feature! other browsers are taking features to replace them later: just look at firefox and Rust: they removed support to C++ developing to give place for Rust: a more secure alternative to c++. if you read tech news, you would know the other browsers are taking features away for 2 reasons: a) they are dead or dyeing and b) they are going to get replaced by something better

@becm: I might just kill the dependency altogether. It is not really a hard requirement but without it we tend to get people complaining that sites look weird when these fonts are not pre-installed. Still better that than a whole class of users cannot install at all

@newscpq said in Work begins on 1.16 – Vivaldi Browser snapshot 1.16.1170.3: feature, not a bug You mean this Feature?

@serket seems to be a server issue. I see it all the time this week on different systems and user profiles.

@ayespy: Hi. Sometimes certain fixes don't get mentioned in changelogs as I've seen reports on that happening before. I usually check to see if the scrollbar issues have been fixed. One is, but haven't seen the other issue addressed. Unless they're tied together. Thanks.

This problem has not been fixed for the latest snapshot 1.6.687.3 (Win7 32bit). Please fix it! I'm looking forward to it.

@wojcieche: OMG YES! Thank you all so much!

@dleon MKV aka Matroska Video is a Container format that comes with different extensions like e.g. WEBM etc., which are all based on the same format. Some of the others only support subgroups of what is allowed inside but definitely everything video fits into it and is streamable if the codec used is fit for it, see among others VP8 or 9 which are used e.g. by Youtube and were especially developed with streaming in mind.