@mossman Those execrable peeps wot go gratuitously OT at the drop of a hat are just soooo tiresome. Onya for having the willpower to avoid that massive character flaw. Speaking of floors btw, i really wish someone would paint my front door soon, & also, gosh but it's a bleak rainy day here today. The consequence of course is that the ambiguity has put on weight, the point is taken, the elk is dead, the beast stops at Swindon, Chabrol stops at nothing, I'm having treatment... & MPFC forever.
I cannot run the snapshot for some unknown reason on any computer
C:\Vivaldi Snap directory
Has worked forever before!!!
Either my method is wrong or the download is perhaps corrupt
Help anyone....thank you
@npro Teehee, i strongly endorse/support/concur.
I have stubbornly persisted on & off for the past few days to go through most of my large suite of regular fav sites, one by one tuning uBO to them. In most cases i was pleasantly surprised that i seemed able to control these sites nearly as well as with uM ... but there's now three of my favs that simply refuse to work as well in uBO as they do in uM. The granular matrix component control available in uM is simply superb.
Then, once i was done, i decided to take a sticky-beak at the comparative resource consumption. I assumed they would be more or less the same, hence i was pretty surprised to discover that as well as its surgically-precise tuning control [or more likely, exactly because of it], uM wiped the floor with uBO. Whilst i'm not, anyone running on limited hardware should like this uM advantage.
Though it's taken a fair bit of effort & a lot of time to reach this point, i'm actually pleased to have done it, because now i have a renewed quantified rationale to explain to myself, anytime in future that i start wondering anew why am i using uM rather than uBO.
There is only one thing for which uBO would be a better choice in Vivaldi than uM, for anybody who likes using a UI Zoom < 100% ... uBO's UI seems not to break as badly as uM's UI does.
When will the segment heap be supported? It's only a description of the manifest file, so support it with the following snapshot don't you?