No problem on 1600x1200, not so good on 1200x1600 portrait mode.
The disappearing links in the header and the icons at top right is more of an issue than the disappearing bread-crumb trail, but it should be possible to make the heading wrap to multiple lines.
Off-topic discussion moved from Team Blog to the Forum Feature Requests Forum.
The Feature Requests Forum has a sticky post that appears at the top of every page, but a day rarely goes by when I don't have to mark a thread as a duplicate. Even if someone has clearly read the sticky post, they sometimes don't know how to search or don't understand the instructions.
One has to make allowance for users not having English as their first language, and not knowing all of the features that are already available in Vivaldi.
You can block all cookies and then allow them on a per-domain basis by clicking the box with the padlock in the address bar and going to cookies.
It won't prompt you, but that should match what you want.
@lonm said in What about a feature with a bar percentage till the next stable release?:
Definitely not a stupid idea. It's a good idea that's implemented in many places for other projects: https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/milestones
However, Vivaldi tends to operate on a WIR (When It's Ready) methodology for releases. Having a progress bar to keep track to might somewhat restrict the V devs to operate in the manner that they prefer.
Feeling much better now, hah! Thank you for replying.
@quhno said in What about a feature with a bar percentage till the next stable release?:
@meymigrou Yes, that would be fun, but difficult for various reasons:
For one browsers have become hellishly complicated things over the years and sometimes it is hard to change things without breaking others, then because there are different development streams and the builds are picked as soon as a stream becomes stable enough to release to the public without breaking (too many) things.
Sadly that can't always be predicted and picking a % value is next to impossible.
Yeah I get it now. Still, that would be fun! :D
@pesala Yes sure, thank you and please forgive me for not being more thorough. I also know of the list, but it is a list of all votes, which is not a quick read when there are many of them. And anyway is always slower than some indication that I - specifically I - already voted.
edit: I mean, something like "likes" in many sites, even though a bazillion people also liked the same as I did, I don't need to scroll through the list to recall if I already "liked" it.
Weird... For me the top search box doesn't search current forum/thread only, instead it search every forum & thread with the search word. Then if i click on the gears icon, it will simply take me to the same search page as the 2nd search function.
My point 2 suggestion is useful for thread with too many post, & it suppose to only show post with matched word. This will save time as you won't have to read every post in a thread to get info you need.
That's a general forum problem. There is no way to sort a subforum by date of creation and we can't see, if we voted for the original post of a thread from the subforum overview, which would be useful for the feature request section, but less so everywhere else. I'm afraid this can't be solved with help of the extension, because there is no way to check for a vote before opening the thread. This would have to be implemented by Vivaldi.
@pesala Perhaps "intuitive" was the wrong choice of words. But that doesn't change the fact that even if new users coming to the forum try to use search, they may struggle to use it effectively if it acts in a away that they do not expect (and if they are new, that expectation is likely built off of web search engines).
I do not know of anywhere that the syntax of searching on this forum is explained, there are certainly no links to such documentation on the search page. The advanced search drop-down helps a little, but even that doesn't offer an explanation of how the boolean operators are in use.
@pesala I don't know what to say. Now I have the same result as your 499. I confirm that they are 572, so there is always something that does not work properly, there are 73 and are not few.
The fact remains that the first post is 10 days ago, and is not correct and makes it difficult to follow the new posts.
To you, also correctly shows the new discussions today?