@Eggcorn Oh, yes, i forgot all these other oligarchs and criminals.

Looks pretty lame to me. JMO,though.

@vvklaus Ah, I closed that link after the lack of response. Figured you left the forum.

Here is a new link: https://icedrive.net/r/1fhhKG6CKTGDdpH4hp8813C7BvxKt19V2F64RTHc

It is open until the end of the month. Not sure I will be able to help, but can't really know until I see it.

@vivaldinomad If I am not mistaken, all of these requests have been made already. Only post one new request per topic, after searching and voting for existing topics.

Welcome to the Community. Here are a few links for your bookmarks that you may find useful:

Help on Feature Requests • Add Search as Web Panel Vivaldi Help Forum Markdown Help Using the Forum Search Local Forums in your language Modding Vivaldi Web Panels Vivaldi for Android Snapshot vs Stable Vivaldi's Business Model Help us grow

@jwilson79 Thanks for hint.

The smartphone version of the Yandex browser has one interesting feature: It can block junk telephone calls.

Brave crashes every time for me after being open about 20-30 seconds ... no way to fix it ... oh, well ... I like Vivaldi quite a bit better, anyway. 🙂

@Poto Perhaps Vivaldi should send a Firefox user agent to those booking sites.

@Priest72 , they say "if you don't like the weather in Iceland, wait 10 minutes"

P.S. The problem recurs on Ubuntu with recent versions of Firefox, Chrome and Vivaldi. Seems like a problem with Chromium, though I've noticed different Chromium-based browsers offering a different selection of imports.

@grogge said in Vivaldi (as Chrome based browser) causes a DCOM 10016 error in the Windows Event Log (with solution):

Will the Vivaldi team actually look into this? I mean they surely have ways to send a bugfix upstream. Or should I file a bug report with Chrome? What if the problem is known at Google and they have decided to ignore it? Would Vivaldi devs still be interested to look into it?

To answer this: we have been fixing some Chromium issues in the past, and we can look into it if the issue is severe enough - though in this case, it looks like a minor inconvenience rather than a show-stopper. Nevertheless, Chromium issues should be reported upstream first.

@ender85 Vivaldi did not remove it, seems it came up with Chromium 102.0.5005.55 core.
As i investigated the "Fill passwords on account selection" setting is hidden in Flags on Chromium 101, too. Perhaps this bug: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1320044

@Skygge said in Disable cross-site password hinting.:

How to disable it?

You can't.
The password manager is Chromium core.
The Chromium devs have to fix it in upstream and when that is done, Vivaldi can get a fix.

Found a related bug in Chromiums tracker a6 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1170836&q=password save domain&can=2
But i dislike digging for more.

For what it's worth, I got the same result when testing in Chrome/Chromium 100, Edge 100, Opera 86 so this is clearly a Chromium core issue.

But yeah, pretty stupid idea to redo the request instead of just downloading from cache. Blame Chromium devs I guess - that's what we always do 😂

Also there is something wrong with that site, it does not give a correct number for the content-lenght header, this could even be a potential cause of the issue:

$ curl -I "https://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?call=&arn=&state=&city=&freq=530&fre2=1700&type=0&facid=&class=&list=4&ThisTab=Results+to+This+Page%2FTab&dist=&dlat2=&mlat2=&slat2=&NS=N&dlon2=&mlon2=&slon2=&EW=W&size=9" HTTP/2 200 server: Sun-Java-System-Web-Server/7.0 content-type: text/html content-length: 25412 expires: Mon, 02 May 2022 20:12:36 GMT cache-control: max-age=0, no-cache, no-store pragma: no-cache date: Mon, 02 May 2022 20:12:36 GMT strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000 ; includeSubDomains

Actually, come to think of it, by the look of the cache-control, expires and pragma header, it might be that Chromium does the "correct" thing here, as the headers tell the client browser to not cache or store the content at all. Again, stupid, but this one's on the site devs.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cache-Control

I use Puppylinux, and I have used PM for years, but the Vivaldi is my main browser now. I still keep PM, and I use it for some specific sites, because I am too lazy to modify my settings. But I have a problem with sites that only want visits from the latest versions of other global browsers, and PM is not one of them.

@streptococcus It’s not about which engine is better. Vivaldi chose to use Blink and this should be the same independent from operating system.

Seamonkey was a product of it's time and the true lineal descendant of the netscape era.Still a solid stable browser i should add but has limited extensions.

See some people prefer what we call the "golden years" and don't really want or need contemporary bells and whistles and are quite happy to use a browser for what it was originally conceived for which was the display of only HTML documents.
However as time has gone on we have inadvertedly added components to a browser like multi media capacities and other extras whichis not in accordance with the purpose of a web browser.

Seamonkey still retains the spirit and essence of the original concept of a browser and there are still many people who wish to use such a tool.

Seamonkey was one of the shoulders that modern browsers stood on to get where they are today.

I cannot believe that current Opera is faster than Vivaldi. The last time I used it (after it had been sold to the Chinese), trying to download anything was almost glacial. Page loading was also slower than with other browsers.

@legocoder It isn't a problem with your code; it is a problem on Vivaldi's end, so no need to worry about it.

Vivaldi is sort of an app/extension on top of the Chromium core, so some extension aspect of the browser that is being injected is probably responsible for the error.

If you inspect the user interface, you will see multiple instances of that error in the console. Thanks to the developers for bringing that error to regular webpage consoles as well! Wouldn't want us modders to have all the fun with such an exciting feature... 🙄